Re: RFS: netbeans_7.0.1+dfsg1-6

Am Donnerstag, den 07.11.2013, 22:46 +0100 schrieb Matthias Klose: > Am 06.11.2013 21:11, schrieb Joachim Zobel: > > * Workaround for bug #720684 in openjdk-6-jdk. > > - Changes the jdk dependency to openjdk-7-jdk. > > - Changes the laucher script to use openjdk-7-jdk. > > so this st

RFS: xmlgraphics-commons/1.5-4

Hi all, I've updated the xmlgraphics-commons package and I'm looking for a sponsor to upload it. This update merges a change applied in Ubuntu removing the unnecessary test dependencies declared on libxmlgraphics-commons-java. I also fixed the Javadoc missing from the documentation package. Here

Re: RFS: netbeans_7.0.1+dfsg1-6

Am 06.11.2013 21:11, schrieb Joachim Zobel: > * Workaround for bug #720684 in openjdk-6-jdk. > - Changes the jdk dependency to openjdk-7-jdk. > - Changes the laucher script to use openjdk-7-jdk. so this still keeps an rc issue open for jessie to not build using openjdk-7. -- To UN

gradle

I'm working through the Spring 3.2.x packaging which uses the build tool - gradle. Also, one of Spring's dependencies is using it [Hibernate 4] along with gradle itself and groovy. It's definitely increasing in popularity with open source java projects. I think it may have the necessary traction t

Packaging Spring Framework 3.2.x

I am working on the packaging for Spring 3.2.x and it depends on jruby. Looking at the QA page [1] it appears to be part of a ruby 1.8 removal. So I wondered if anyone is packaging the later version or what the plan is? There are also dependencies on hibernate 4.x. I see that 3 is already packaged

Re: Resolving the Tomcat 6/7 conflict

Le 07/11/2013 07:59, tony mancill a écrit : > I am interested in looking at Tomcat 8, but just haven't found any > cycles to dig into it. I feel like I should try to resolve the pending > issues with tomcat6/7 co-installability and other pending uploads first. > I'm going to try to set aside som