Re: ecj vs javac

2013-09-29 Thread Emmanuel Bourg
Le 27/09/2013 22:06, Andrew Ross a écrit : > I'm tempted to report these as upstream bugs - the missing casts > definitely appear to be an oversight when you look through the rest of > the eclipselink codebase. That sounds like a good idea. If the fix isn't too complicated I think it's better to

Re: RFS: jpathwatch 0.95-1 (new)

2013-09-29 Thread Jakub Adam
Hi Tony, On 29.9.2013 19:20, tony mancill wrote: The upstream source files indicate that jpathwatch is licensed under the GPL or GPL + the "Classpath" exception, and the LICENSE.txt supports this, with a "Classpath" exception tacked onto the end of the file. However, the debian/copyright indica

Re: RFS: jpathwatch 0.95-1 (new)

2013-09-29 Thread tony mancill
On 09/28/2013 05:03 AM, Jakub Adam wrote: > Dear java packagers, > > I am looking for a sponsor for package "jpathwatch". > > * Package name: jpathwatch >Version : 0.95-1 >Upstream Author : Uwe Pachler > * URL : http://jpathwatch.wordpress.com > * License

Re: RFS: antlr3 3.2-9 - [UPLOADED]

2013-09-29 Thread tony mancill
On 09/28/2013 05:53 AM, Jakub Adam wrote: > Dear java packagers, > > I am looking for a sponsor for package antlr3. > > Package source code can be accessed at pkg-java svn repository: > > http://anonscm.debian.org/viewvc/pkg-java/trunk/antlr3 > > This version adds OSGi metadata into JAR manif

Re: Documentation on package maintenance

2013-09-29 Thread tony mancill
On 09/27/2013 09:45 AM, Joachim Zobel wrote: > Hi. > > Is there any documentation on maintaining existing packages. The docs I > find focus on how to create a package. I myself currently try to find > out how the netbeans package from git works. I will find out, but it > could be a lot easier with