Re: gephi debian package

2013-09-02 Thread Rogério Brito
Hi there. On Mar 04 2013, Ximin Luo wrote: > Hi, apparently there is a proper Debianised effort (adhering to Debian's > dyn-link and source licensing requirements) going on: > > http://wiki.gephi.org/index.php/Specification_-_Debian_Package >From a quick look at that, I see that there are very f

Bug#721678: RFP: liblenskit-java -- toolkit for building, researching, and studying recommedner systems

2013-09-02 Thread Rogério Brito
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist * Package name: liblenskit-java Version : 2.0 Upstream Author : GroupLens Research * URL : http://lenskit.grouplens.org/ * License : LGPLv2.1+ Programming Lang: Java Description : toolkit for b

Re: jmock2

2013-09-02 Thread Emmanuel Bourg
The build failure has been fixed upstream but it hasn't been released yet: https://github.com/jmock-developers/jmock-library/commit/6758febcbd09caf7db90df473fe84f5f41eb6037 You could probably try to upgrade the package to this revision. Emmanuel Bourg -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-java-r

Re: jmock2

2013-09-02 Thread Emmanuel Bourg
Le 02/09/2013 17:55, Stephen Nelson a écrit : > Thanks for finding that commit. I'll try and build with this later > version and see how it goes. As it's a breaking API change how can I > easily find the packages that have a build dependency on jmock? You can get the reverse build dependencies wi

Re: jmock2

2013-09-02 Thread Stephen Nelson
On Mon, Sep 2, 2013 at 4:26 PM, Emmanuel Bourg wrote: > The build failure has been fixed upstream but it hasn't been released yet: > > https://github.com/jmock-developers/jmock-library/commit/6758febcbd09caf7db90df473fe84f5f41eb6037 > > You could probably try to upgrade the package to this revisio

Re: jmock2

2013-09-02 Thread Sylvestre Ledru
On 02/09/2013 16:14, Stephen Nelson wrote: > There's a bug in the jmock project [1] that is blocking the packaging > of openjpa. There is also the more severe FTBFS bug [2] which might > require a breaking change to the api according to the author [3]. I > was intending to look into this in more de

Re: jmock2

2013-09-02 Thread Sylvestre Ledru
On 02/09/2013 16:28, Emmanuel Bourg wrote: > #721538 is easy to fix, but the API changes implied by #717122 would be > better dealt by upstream. An alternative would be to build jmock > explicitly with openjdk6, but that would prevent its removal from Jessie. Please, don't depend on OpenJDK6. We ar

Re: jmock2

2013-09-02 Thread Emmanuel Bourg
#721538 is easy to fix, but the API changes implied by #717122 would be better dealt by upstream. An alternative would be to build jmock explicitly with openjdk6, but that would prevent its removal from Jessie. Is jmock required by the core of openjpa or only some of its unit tests? Disabling some

jmock2

2013-09-02 Thread Stephen Nelson
There's a bug in the jmock project [1] that is blocking the packaging of openjpa. There is also the more severe FTBFS bug [2] which might require a breaking change to the api according to the author [3]. I was intending to look into this in more detail and attempt to fix this if no one else is work