On 08/14/2013 09:48 AM, Jakub Adam wrote:
> On 26.6.2013 16:26, Niels Thykier wrote:
>> Building the package[1] causes changes to the source files (ignore the
>> d/changelog, that was dch -rm).
>>
>> $ git diff --stat
>> debian/changelog |4 ++--
>> debian/libjavaewah-java.poms |
Hi Thomas,
I'm not subscribed to debian-java, so cc:ing both lists - sorry.
On Wed, Aug 14, 2013 at 07:04:15AM +0200, Thomas Koch wrote:
> Ioan Eugen Stan scheduled a Java Meeting at debconf,2013-08-15, 17:30 :
> https://penta.debconf.org/penta/schedule/dc13/event/985.en.html
> Unfortunately he
On Thu, Aug 15, 2013 at 8:09 AM, Stephen Nelson wrote:
> The popcon value for this package is low and there do not seem to be
> any packages depending on openjpa. I'm not asking for it's removal but
> would like to understand what is the deciding factor(s) on whether a
> package should remain in De
On 15/08/2013 13:09, Stephen Nelson wrote:
> I notice this package has a couple of outstanding bugs which I should
> be able to fix. I just want to ask a couple of questions:
>
> The popcon value for this package is low and there do not seem to be
> any packages depending on openjpa. I'm not asking
I notice this package has a couple of outstanding bugs which I should
be able to fix. I just want to ask a couple of questions:
The popcon value for this package is low and there do not seem to be
any packages depending on openjpa. I'm not asking for it's removal but
would like to understand what
Le mercredi 14 août 2013 07:04:15 Thomas Koch a écrit :
> Ioan Eugen Stan scheduled a Java Meeting at debconf
> Unfortunately he could not make it to debconf. I think we should still meet
> and discuss current state and matters of Java in Debian.
>
> Is there anybody who would volunteer to collect
6 matches
Mail list logo
