Re: jarwrapper dependency

2013-07-10 Thread Eugene Zhukov
On Wed, Jul 10, 2013 at 5:17 PM, Matthew Johnson wrote: > On Mon Jul 08 12:05, Eugene Zhukov wrote: >> >> > So, you have the dependency in the binary package, you have the >> >> > symlink. Is the >> >> > jar executable? You must do that for binfmt_misc to even try doing >> >> > anything. >> >> >

Re: jarwrapper dependency

2013-07-10 Thread Matthew Johnson
On Mon Jul 08 12:05, Eugene Zhukov wrote: > >> > So, you have the dependency in the binary package, you have the symlink. > >> > Is the > >> > jar executable? You must do that for binfmt_misc to even try doing > >> > anything. > >> > Your options are manually setting it to executable, or calling

Re: Bug#715530: Bug#715530: jai-core: Please build explicitly with OpenJDK 6

2013-07-10 Thread Andreas Tille
Hi, On Wed, Jul 10, 2013 at 10:25:54AM +0200, Olivier Sallou wrote: > > On 07/10/2013 09:40 AM, Andreas Tille wrote: > > Hi Niels, > > > > I perfectly agree that we should not try to keep OpenJDK-6 alive for > > ages. However, jai-core is packaged as precondition for other packages > > that are

Re: [Debian-med-packaging] Bug#715530: jai-core: Please build explicitly with OpenJDK 6

2013-07-10 Thread Olivier Sallou
On 07/10/2013 09:40 AM, Andreas Tille wrote: > Hi Niels, > > I perfectly agree that we should not try to keep OpenJDK-6 alive for > ages. However, jai-core is packaged as precondition for other packages > that are quite important (for Debian Med). The problem is that as you > probably know all t

Re: Bug#715530: jai-core: Please build explicitly with OpenJDK 6

2013-07-10 Thread Andreas Tille
Hi Niels, I perfectly agree that we should not try to keep OpenJDK-6 alive for ages. However, jai-core is packaged as precondition for other packages that are quite important (for Debian Med). The problem is that as you probably know all these Java programs just include a jai-core.jar which is u