Re: jarwrapper dependency

2013-06-19 Thread Eugene Zhukov
On Thu, Jun 20, 2013 at 2:15 AM, Matthew Johnson wrote: > On Wed Jun 19 15:04, Eugene Zhukov wrote: >> >> Otherwise you are missing the manifest pointing to the main-class. >> > Yes, it works. In fact with d/foobar.links the link gets created, but >> > doesn't work (complains about permissions) no

Re: jarwrapper dependency

2013-06-19 Thread Matthew Johnson
On Wed Jun 19 15:04, Eugene Zhukov wrote: > >> Otherwise you are missing the manifest pointing to the main-class. > > Yes, it works. In fact with d/foobar.links the link gets created, but > > doesn't work (complains about permissions) nor jarwrapper dependency > > is added. > > Any other ideas how

Re: RFS: sitemesh/2.4.1+dfsg-3 (servlet api transition) - [UPLOADED]

2013-06-19 Thread tony mancill
On 06/16/2013 12:56 AM, Emmanuel Bourg wrote: > Hi all, > > I'm looking for a sponsor to upload the sitemesh package. I updated the > dependency on the Servlet API and I moved Freemarker and Velocity to > suggested dependencies (sitemesh can be used without these packages). > > Here is the change

Re: jarwrapper dependency

2013-06-19 Thread Eugene Zhukov
On Wed, Jun 19, 2013 at 10:39 AM, Eugene Zhukov wrote: > On Wed, Jun 19, 2013 at 10:34 AM, Mathieu Malaterre wrote: >> On Wed, Jun 19, 2013 at 9:28 AM, Eugene Zhukov wrote: >>> On Wed, Jun 19, 2013 at 10:02 AM, Mathieu Malaterre >>> wrote: On Wed, Jun 19, 2013 at 8:03 AM, Eugene Zhukov

Re: Java defaults for kfreebsd-amd64

2013-06-19 Thread Rene Engelhard
On Wed, Jun 19, 2013 at 10:41:18AM +0100, Steven Chamberlain wrote: > There are some curious mentions of gcj also in the failed build log. Which are totally irrelevant for the thing here. You should trust the person who fought with this crap since 11 years. > > basename: missing operand > > Try `

Re: Java defaults for kfreebsd-amd64

2013-06-19 Thread Steven Chamberlain
> On Tue, Jun 18, 2013 at 11:58:30PM +0200, Robert Millan wrote: >> Are you sure those problems are not caused precisely because of gcj? I wouldn't rule anything out yet... If Python is used as part of the build system it could even be something to do with that (we still have random thread-relate

Re: jarwrapper dependency

2013-06-19 Thread Eugene Zhukov
On Wed, Jun 19, 2013 at 10:34 AM, Mathieu Malaterre wrote: > On Wed, Jun 19, 2013 at 9:28 AM, Eugene Zhukov wrote: >> On Wed, Jun 19, 2013 at 10:02 AM, Mathieu Malaterre wrote: >>> On Wed, Jun 19, 2013 at 8:03 AM, Eugene Zhukov wrote: Hello, How to add jarwrapper dependency (func

Re: jarwrapper dependency

2013-06-19 Thread Mathieu Malaterre
On Wed, Jun 19, 2013 at 9:28 AM, Eugene Zhukov wrote: > On Wed, Jun 19, 2013 at 10:02 AM, Mathieu Malaterre wrote: >> On Wed, Jun 19, 2013 at 8:03 AM, Eugene Zhukov wrote: >>> Hello, >>> >>> How to add jarwrapper dependency (functionality) to a package >>> debianized with mh_make? >>> Simply add

Re: jarwrapper dependency

2013-06-19 Thread Eugene Zhukov
On Wed, Jun 19, 2013 at 10:02 AM, Mathieu Malaterre wrote: > On Wed, Jun 19, 2013 at 8:03 AM, Eugene Zhukov wrote: >> Hello, >> >> How to add jarwrapper dependency (functionality) to a package >> debianized with mh_make? >> Simply adding it to depends in d/control seems to have no effect. > > Her

Re: jarwrapper dependency

2013-06-19 Thread Mathieu Malaterre
On Wed, Jun 19, 2013 at 8:03 AM, Eugene Zhukov wrote: > Hello, > > How to add jarwrapper dependency (functionality) to a package > debianized with mh_make? > Simply adding it to depends in d/control seems to have no effect. Here is what I did in jiipview: $ cat debian/jiipview.links usr/share/ja