Op 2013-05-24 om 15:37 schreef Alexandre Rossi:
>
> I'll be working on this, but the version on mentors.debian.org seems
> pretty acceptable to me for review.
>
> Regarding the git repo issue, I can branch of the debian/2.2-1_pre+1
> tag in order to take into account packaging review comments, wh
Le 24/05/2013 16:50, Emmanuel Bourg a écrit :
> I'm not sure to understand the reason of this difference, and if it's
> safe to continue like this.
Figured out myself, that was the missing --java-lib flag.
This really needs to be changed. I suggest adding a --no-java-lib flag
and assume we want
On Thu, May 23, 2013 at 6:40 PM, peter green wrote:
>>
>> :-) I'm one who asked there some time back why java7 is no longer in
>> the archives (unstable/experimental), while the last binaries I had
>> installed still work OK on my mini-pc...
>>
>> I'm just curious, sorry for asking to the lists..
More plugins, more fun ! Here is another update ready to be uploaded :)
Here is the changelog:
* New upstream release
* Added the missing --java-lib flag to libmaven-antrun-plugin-java.poms
* Bump Standards-Version to 3.9.4. No changes were required.
* debian/copyright: Updated to comply
On 05/24/2013 08:08 AM, Mathieu Malaterre wrote:
> On Fri, May 24, 2013 at 4:50 PM, Emmanuel Bourg wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I have updated some Maven plugins and I get a lintian warning stating
>> the package is missing a public jar in /usr/share/java. It seems the
>> previous packages had the jar file
Hi all,
I prepared an update for another Maven plugin.
Here is the changelog:
* New upstream release
* Added the missing --java-lib flag to libmaven-clean-plugin-java.poms
* Updated Standards-Version to 3.9.4 (no changes)
* debian/copyright: Updated the Format URI to 1.0
http://mentors.
On Fri, May 24, 2013 at 4:50 PM, Emmanuel Bourg wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have updated some Maven plugins and I get a lintian warning stating
> the package is missing a public jar in /usr/share/java. It seems the
> previous packages had the jar files in /usr/share/java, but now we only
> get them in /usr
Hi,
I have updated some Maven plugins and I get a lintian warning stating
the package is missing a public jar in /usr/share/java. It seems the
previous packages had the jar files in /usr/share/java, but now we only
get them in /usr/share/maven-repo.
I'm not sure to understand the reason of this d
Hi all,
I updated the jarjar-maven-plugin to the latest upstream release.
Here is the changelog:
* New upstream release
* Upgraded the dependency on ASM (3.x -> 4.x)
* Updated Standards-Version to 3.9.4
* debian/copyright: Updated the Format URI to 1.0
http://mentors.debian.net/package/
Hi,
> At http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/d/davmail/
> there is a davmail_4.2.1.orig.tar.gz and a
> davmail_4.2.1-1~3.gbp244580.debian.tar.gz
>
> Upstream has davmail-srconly-4.2.1-2089.tgz
> and `uscan` makes davmail_4.2.1-2089.orig.tar.gz
>
> I will be spending time to see if I can co
Hi,
> In general the issue appears to be that there's no orig.tar.gz file and
> not documentation about how to create one. Alexandre, on May 10th you
> posted to the bug report that you uploaded the packages (presumably one
> of which was libhtmlcleaner-java) to mentors.debian.net, but I'm not
>
Le 23/05/2013 19:50, tony mancill a écrit :
> Uploaded. Thank you for the update. I think it'll be useful to have as
> much of build tool-chain updated before the next Java7 test build.'
Thank you for the upload Tony.
What other build tools should be upgraded? The Maven plugins?
Emmanuel Bou
Hi all,
I have updated the commons-configuration package to the latest upstream
release. This package depends on libcommons-jexl2-java that needs to be
migrated from experimental to unstable.
Here is the changelog:
* New upstream release
* Added new build dependencies (libjavacc-maven-plugin
13 matches
Mail list logo
