On Wed, May 22, 2013 at 2:49 PM, Eugene Zhukov wrote:
> Hello,
> I am trying to fix packaging of [1]
> First debuild run works perfectly, after that only every second one succeeds.
> It happens because some automatic pom.xml patching/unpatching fails.
> After playing with quilt commands debuild st
On 05/21/2013 03:58 AM, Jakub Adam wrote:
> Dear java packagers,
>
> I am looking for a sponsor for package "eclipse-linuxtools".
>
> * Package name: eclipse-linuxtools
>Version : 1.2.1+dfsg-1
>Upstream Author : Eclipse Linux Tools project
>
> * URL : http://www
Hi all,
Ant 1.9.1 has just been released and I updated it's package. One of the
patches we were maintaining has been integrated upstream.
Here is the changelog:
* New upstream release
- Refreshed the patches
- Removed the patch 0001-detect-classpath-based-JVM.patch (merged
upstream)
On 2013-05-22 17:31, tony mancill wrote:
> [...]
>
> Hi Niels,
>
> I appreciate your feedback. I guess Java7 should be considered a
> "transition" and thus should go through the Release Team.
>
At least that is what I suspect.
> IMO, I don't think we need 100% success on the rebuild - i.e. I'
On 05/22/2013 12:42 AM, Niels Thykier wrote:
> On 2013-05-22 06:52, tony mancill wrote:
>> Dear Debian Java List,
>>
>> In an attempt to advance the use of openjdk7 for jessie, I have uploaded
>> java-common 0.49 (essentially the same 0.48 package that was in
>> experimental, but now targeting unst
Hi.
Il 22/05/2013 14:46, Emmanuel Bourg ha scritto:
>> Please let me know if you're aware of other resources which suggest to
>> behave differently.
>
> I may have misinterpreted the specification. It states:
>
> "This field should either include the full text of the license(s) or
> include a po
Hi Giovanni,
Thank you very much for your review!
Le 22/05/2013 11:06, Giovanni Mascellani a écrit :
> Please let me know if you're aware of other resources which suggest to
> behave differently.
I may have misinterpreted the specification. It states:
"This field should either include the full
Hello,
I am trying to fix packaging of [1]
First debuild run works perfectly, after that only every second one succeeds.
It happens because some automatic pom.xml patching/unpatching fails.
After playing with quilt commands debuild starts to run successfully
every time. But once you unpatch pom.xml
Hi Emanuel.
Il 16/04/2013 12:28, Emmanuel Bourg ha scritto:
> Hi all,
>
> This is a minor update to this library that was still declaring a
> dependency on the JRE.
>
> Here is the changelog:
>
> * Removed the dependency on ${shlibs:Depends}
> * Removed the dependency on the JRE (not required
On 2013-05-22 06:52, tony mancill wrote:
> Dear Debian Java List,
>
> In an attempt to advance the use of openjdk7 for jessie, I have uploaded
> java-common 0.49 (essentially the same 0.48 package that was in
> experimental, but now targeting unstable) to the DELAYED/3 queue.
>
> The delay is bec
10 matches
Mail list logo
