2013/5/17 Emmanuel Bourg
> For JAF specifically I think we are safe, I checked that GCJ provided an
> implementation [1]. I haven't compared the implementation class by class
> but it seems quite complete. I verified that libgnumail-java could build
> on kfreebsd without libgnujaf-java.
>
> On th
Hi Niels,
2013/5/17 Niels Thykier
> On 2013-05-17 22:31, Damien Raude-Morvan wrote:
> >> Emmanuel Bourg
> >> There are three packages implementing the Java Activation Framework in
> >> Debian. They could be removed now that Java 6 and upward integrate the
> >> most recent version of JAF.
> >>
>
Hi Damien,
Le 17/05/2013 22:31, Damien Raude-Morvan a écrit :
> Even if default-jdk package will soon become alias for openjdk-7 [1],
> for now it's a mix of openjdk-6 on some platform and GCJ (vaguely Java 5
> compliant) on others.
>
> It means that if someone try to build a package which use J
On 2013-05-17 22:31, Damien Raude-Morvan wrote:
> Hi Emmanuel,
>
> 2013/5/16 Emmanuel Bourg
>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> There are three packages implementing the Java Activation Framework in
>> Debian. They could be removed now that Java 6 and upward integrate the
>> most recent version of JAF.
>>
>
> E
Hi Emmanuel,
2013/5/16 Emmanuel Bourg
> Hi all,
>
> There are three packages implementing the Java Activation Framework in
> Debian. They could be removed now that Java 6 and upward integrate the
> most recent version of JAF.
>
Even if default-jdk package will soon become alias for openjdk-7 [1
Hi.
(Cc:-ing debian-java@d.o for more comments)
Il 17/05/2013 19:14, nicolas.patr...@gmail.com ha scritto:
> Le 16/05/2013 22:42:01, Giovanni Mascellani a écrit :
>
>> It sounds like you're using a headless JRE. Could you please check
>> the output of:
>
>> java -version
> java version "1.7.0_
Hi all,
I'm looking for a sponsor to upload my update to the libmx4j-java
package. I removed the patch skipping the call to rmic during the build
and checked it still builds with GCJ on kfreebsd.
Here is the changelog:
* Removed the dependency on the Activation Framework (libgnujaf-java)
* T
On 05/17/2013 06:37 AM, Thomas Koch wrote:
> On Thursday, May 16, 2013 12:51:38 PM Olivier Sallou wrote:
>> Hi,
>> when do you plan to move maven-debian-helper 1.6.1 from experimental to
>> unstable ?
>> I need it for an other package to put it in unstable.
> I first wanted to do more tests. But
8 matches
Mail list logo