Re: default-jdk versionned depends ? Was: Java Activation Framework removal

2013-05-17 Thread Damien Raude-Morvan
2013/5/17 Emmanuel Bourg > For JAF specifically I think we are safe, I checked that GCJ provided an > implementation [1]. I haven't compared the implementation class by class > but it seems quite complete. I verified that libgnumail-java could build > on kfreebsd without libgnujaf-java. > > On th

Re: default-jdk versionned depends ? Was: Java Activation Framework removal

2013-05-17 Thread Damien Raude-Morvan
Hi Niels, 2013/5/17 Niels Thykier > On 2013-05-17 22:31, Damien Raude-Morvan wrote: > >> Emmanuel Bourg > >> There are three packages implementing the Java Activation Framework in > >> Debian. They could be removed now that Java 6 and upward integrate the > >> most recent version of JAF. > >> >

Re: default-jdk versionned depends ? Was: Java Activation Framework removal

2013-05-17 Thread Emmanuel Bourg
Hi Damien, Le 17/05/2013 22:31, Damien Raude-Morvan a écrit : > Even if default-jdk package will soon become alias for openjdk-7 [1], > for now it's a mix of openjdk-6 on some platform and GCJ (vaguely Java 5 > compliant) on others. > > It means that if someone try to build a package which use J

Re: default-jdk versionned depends ? Was: Java Activation Framework removal

2013-05-17 Thread Niels Thykier
On 2013-05-17 22:31, Damien Raude-Morvan wrote: > Hi Emmanuel, > > 2013/5/16 Emmanuel Bourg > >> Hi all, >> >> There are three packages implementing the Java Activation Framework in >> Debian. They could be removed now that Java 6 and upward integrate the >> most recent version of JAF. >> > > E

default-jdk versionned depends ? Was: Java Activation Framework removal

2013-05-17 Thread Damien Raude-Morvan
Hi Emmanuel, 2013/5/16 Emmanuel Bourg > Hi all, > > There are three packages implementing the Java Activation Framework in > Debian. They could be removed now that Java 6 and upward integrate the > most recent version of JAF. > Even if default-jdk package will soon become alias for openjdk-7 [1

Re: Re : Bug#708543: geogebra: Geogebra crashes now on start

2013-05-17 Thread Giovanni Mascellani
Hi. (Cc:-ing debian-java@d.o for more comments) Il 17/05/2013 19:14, nicolas.patr...@gmail.com ha scritto: > Le 16/05/2013 22:42:01, Giovanni Mascellani a écrit : > >> It sounds like you're using a headless JRE. Could you please check >> the output of: > >> java -version > java version "1.7.0_

RFS: libmx4j-java/3.0.2-13 (activation framework removal)

2013-05-17 Thread Emmanuel Bourg
Hi all, I'm looking for a sponsor to upload my update to the libmx4j-java package. I removed the patch skipping the call to rmic during the build and checked it still builds with GCJ on kfreebsd. Here is the changelog: * Removed the dependency on the Activation Framework (libgnujaf-java) * T

Re: maven-debian-helper 1.6.1 to unstable

2013-05-17 Thread olivier.sal...@codeless.fr
On 05/17/2013 06:37 AM, Thomas Koch wrote: > On Thursday, May 16, 2013 12:51:38 PM Olivier Sallou wrote: >> Hi, >> when do you plan to move maven-debian-helper 1.6.1 from experimental to >> unstable ? >> I need it for an other package to put it in unstable. > I first wanted to do more tests. But