Re: RFS: libpgjava

2013-05-13 Thread tony mancill
On 05/12/2013 02:46 PM, Andrew Ross wrote: > libpgjava (9.2-1002-1) unstable; urgency=low > > * New upstream release. > * Bump standards version to 3.9.4 (no changes). > > -- Andrew Ross Sun, 12 May 2013 18:05:06 +0100 Uploaded, tagged in Vcs-Git, and removed from the list of pending expe

RFS: libxstream-java/1.4.4-1

2013-05-13 Thread Emmanuel Bourg
Hi all, Last update today before getting some sleep, here is the latest release of XStream: * New upstream release * Update Standards-Version: 3.9.4 (no changes) http://mentors.debian.net/package/libxstream-java http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/libx/libxstream-java/libxstream-jav

RFS: xmlunit/1.4-1

2013-05-13 Thread Emmanuel Bourg
Hi all, I updated the xmlunit package to the latest upstream release. Here is the changelog: * New upstream release * Refreshed the patches * Updated Standards-Version to 3.9.4 (no changes) * Removed the duplicate Section field for libxmlunit-java * Removed Michael Koch from the Upload

RFS: joda-convert/1.3.1-1

2013-05-13 Thread Emmanuel Bourg
Hi all, After joda-time here comes the expected update of joda-convert. Here is the changelog: * New upstream release * Updated Standards-Version to 3.9.4 (no changes) * debian/orig-tar.sh: Create the tarball in the parent directory * Removed the unused Lintian override on libjoda-conver

Re: changing the java default to java7, and dropping java support for some architectures

2013-05-13 Thread Markus Koschany
Hi, most of these bugs for the java7 transition are only severity "normal" and not all packages are maintained within the Java Team. Wouldn't it be better to raise the severity to "serious" now? I believe i can help in fixing some of them by preparing a minimal NMU or Team upload. Do you have any

Re: changing the java default to java7, and dropping java support for some architectures

2013-05-13 Thread Javier Vasquez
On Mon, May 6, 2013 at 8:22 AM, Matthias Klose wrote: > It's time to change the Java default to java7, and to drop java support on > architectures with non-working java7. Just asking as a loongson-2f user, :-) What makes java7 not to work on those architectures? Building issues? > ... > So the

RFS: libjoda-time-java/2.2-1

2013-05-13 Thread Emmanuel Bourg
Hi all, I updated the joda-time package to the latest upstream release. I also removed the jar files from the upstream tarball. There was already a script filtering the content but I guess it got broken accidentally by a previous update. Here is the changelog: * New upstream release * Added

Re: changing the java default to java7, and dropping java support for some architectures

2013-05-13 Thread James Page
Hey Matthias On 06/05/13 15:22, Matthias Klose wrote: It's time to change the Java default to java7, and to drop java support on architectures with non-working java7. +1 Patches for the transition to Java7 should be available in the BTS, mostly submitted by James Page. Some may be still lur

RFS: jsoup/1.7.2-1 (new upstream release for unstable)

2013-05-13 Thread Emmanuel Bourg
Hi all, I updated the jsoup package to the latest upstream release. Here is the changelog: * New upstream release * Refreshed the patch * Updated the debian/get-orig-source script for the latest release * Fixed the watch file * Updated Standards-Version to 3.9.4 (no changes) * debian