Re: RFS: libcommons-codec-java/1.8-1 (new upstream release for experimental) - [UPLOADED]

On 04/28/2013 01:38 PM, Emmanuel Bourg wrote: > Hi all, > > Commons Codec 1.8 has just been released today, so here is the updated > package :) > > * New upstream release > * Refreshed the patches and the OSGi metadata > > > http://mentors.debian.net/package/libcommons-codec-java > > http:

RFS: libfreemarker-java/2.3.19-1

Hi all, I updated the libfreemarker-java package to the latest upstream release. The issues with Jython have been fixed upstream, so I dropped the patches disabling it. I struggled a bit to get the tests to compile, for some reason the javac task recognized only the main classpath and not the tes

Re: changing the java default to java7, and dropping java support for some architectures

Matthias Klose dixit: >Currently java bindings/packages are built for all architectures, however some >architectures still use gcj as the (only available) Java implementation, and >some OpenJDK zero ports are non-functional at this point, and Debian porters >usually don't care about that. So the

RFS: libjtype-java/0.1.3-1 (new upstream release and watch file update)

Hi all, I updated the libjtype-java package to the latest upstream release and fixed the watch file. Here is the changelog: * New upstream release * Fixed the watch file * Updated Standards-Version to 3.9.4 (no changes) * Added 'Depends: ${misc:Depends}' to clear a Lintian warning * de

Re: changing the java default to java7, and dropping java support for some architectures

Matthias Klose, le Mon 06 May 2013 16:22:30 +0200, a écrit : > - hurd never had openjdk support, and afaik, nobody is working on that. There has been work towards this, notably by Jeremie Koenig. I don't know the status, we just have not made it a strong priority so far. Samuel -- To UNSUBSCRI

changing the java default to java7, and dropping java support for some architectures

It's time to change the Java default to java7, and to drop java support on architectures with non-working java7. Patches for the transition to Java7 should be available in the BTS, mostly submitted by James Page. Some may be still lurking around as diffs in Ubuntu packages, apologies for that. T

Re: RFS: jgit and eclipse-egit 2.3.1-1 (reupload into unstable) - [ITS]

Hi, thanks to Tony for sponsoring jgit and eclipse-egit. I've removed them from Markus' wiki page[1] and marked there few more packages I'd like to have uploaded in the next round. I won't post any further experimental -> sid migration requests to this list and kindly ask potential sponsors to

RFS: ehcache/2.6.7-1

Hi all, I updated the ehcache package for the latest upstream release. That's a minor update, no file changed in the debian/ directory. http://mentors.debian.net/package/ehcache http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/e/ehcache/ehcache_2.6.7-1.dsc Thank you for your reviews, Emmanuel Bourg

Re: Jenkins Build Slave on kFreeBSD

Hi Guido, 2013/5/6 Guido Günther > > > Are there any other options besides gcj on kFreeBSD? > > > > Maybe you can try to install old snapshot of openjdk-7 package which > works > > under kFreeBSD ? > > http://people.debian.org/~drazzib/openjdk/kfreebsd-snapshots/ > > > > [NB: current release of

Re: Jenkins Build Slave on kFreeBSD

Hi Damien, On Sun, May 05, 2013 at 10:06:24PM +0200, Damien Raude-Morvan wrote: > Le vendredi 03 mai 2013 09:48:52 Guido Günther a écrit : > > Hi, > > Hi, > > > did anybody here succeed on running a Jenkins Build Slave on kFreeBSD? > > Using the SSH Slave Plugin on the master (running Wheezy's Op