Re: Pack200 compression of packaged jars

2013-05-03 Thread Eric Lavarde - Debian
Hi, Balancing jar size vs. simplicity of the solution, I'd definitely vote for simplicity: priceless, for everything else there is cheap disk space and bandwidth! Cheers, Eric -- Eric de France, d'Allemagne et de Navarre -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-java-requ...@lists.debian.org with a

Re: Pack200 compression of packaged jars

2013-05-03 Thread Emmanuel Bourg
Le 02/05/2013 18:10, Matthias Klose a écrit : > no, I think the question here is how an xz compressed deb without using > pack200 > looks like, compared to the size of today's packages. Is this just the gain > you > would expect from switching from gzip to xz, or is this more? Ok, I conducted a

Jenkins Build Slave on kFreeBSD

2013-05-03 Thread Guido Günther
Hi, did anybody here succeed on running a Jenkins Build Slave on kFreeBSD? Using the SSH Slave Plugin on the master (running Wheezy's OpenJDK) and gcj-4.7 on the Sid kFreeBSD I get: 05/03/13 09:36:18] [SSH] Checking java version of java [05/03/13 09:36:18] [SSH] java -version returned 1.5.0. [05/0