Re: Bug#569668: davmail ITP status update (Re: ITP: davmail)

2013-04-12 Thread Alexandre Rossi
Hi, > i used the packaging work of Alex and updated the packaging [1] to the > newest version (davmail 4.2.1). Thanks! > As the Wheezy release will still take some little time what about > uploading davmail (and the dependency libhtmlcleaner-java) to > experimental? unstable would be just fine

Re: davmail ITP status update (Re: ITP: davmail)

2013-04-12 Thread Matthias Schmitz
Hi Geert, hi Alex, hello *, Am Mon, 1 Oct 2012 18:42:50 +0200 schrieb Geert Stappers : > On Mon, Oct 01, 2012 at 03:15:42PM +0200, Alexandre Rossi wrote: > > > > I'll be seeking sponsorship when wheezy is realeased, > > I want to be that sponsor. i used the packaging work of Alex and updated th

Re: where is org/json/JSONObject ?

2013-04-12 Thread Thomas Koch
Mathieu Malaterre: > On Fri, Apr 12, 2013 at 4:00 PM, Niels Thykier wrote: > > On 2013-04-12 15:49, Mathieu Malaterre wrote: > >> Does anyone know where is the json java package ? The original json.org library is non free. However I've packaged an alternative which is however lacking a few class

Re: cannot find symbol symbol : constructor JSONTokener(java.io.Reader)

2013-04-12 Thread Niels Thykier
On 2013-04-12 16:50, Mathieu Malaterre wrote: > Does anyone knows why I would be getting: > > [javac] > /home/mathieu/debian/collab/deb-maint/jheliosviewer/trunk/jhelioviewer-2.2.1/src/jhv/src/org/helioviewer/jhv/io/DataSources.java:190: > cannot find symbol > [javac] symbol : constructo

cannot find symbol symbol : constructor JSONTokener(java.io.Reader)

2013-04-12 Thread Mathieu Malaterre
Does anyone knows why I would be getting: [javac] /home/mathieu/debian/collab/deb-maint/jheliosviewer/trunk/jhelioviewer-2.2.1/src/jhv/src/org/helioviewer/jhv/io/DataSources.java:190: cannot find symbol [javac] symbol : constructor JSONTokener(java.io.Reader) [javac] location: class

Re: where is org/json/JSONObject ?

2013-04-12 Thread Mathieu Malaterre
On Fri, Apr 12, 2013 at 4:00 PM, Niels Thykier wrote: > On 2013-04-12 15:49, Mathieu Malaterre wrote: >> Does anyone know where is the json java package ? >> >> All I could find is: >> >> http://codesearch.debian.net/search?q=rowToJSONArray >> >> But the json package seems incomplete: >> >> cannot

Re: where is org/json/JSONObject ?

2013-04-12 Thread Niels Thykier
On 2013-04-12 15:49, Mathieu Malaterre wrote: > Does anyone know where is the json java package ? > > All I could find is: > > http://codesearch.debian.net/search?q=rowToJSONArray > > But the json package seems incomplete: > > cannot find symbol > [javac] symbol : class XML > [javac] l

where is org/json/JSONObject ?

2013-04-12 Thread Mathieu Malaterre
Does anyone know where is the json java package ? All I could find is: http://codesearch.debian.net/search?q=rowToJSONArray But the json package seems incomplete: cannot find symbol [javac] symbol : class XML [javac] location: package org.json [javac] import org.json.XML; [java

Re: Deprecation of *-gcj packages

2013-04-12 Thread Emmanuel Bourg
Le 12/04/2013 13:41, Sylvestre Ledru a écrit : > Maybe I am missing a point but I have the feeling that the -gcj packages > are now a bit useless. > gcj does not seem a very active project [1] and my perception is that > not many people are using gcj packages instead > of the "java package". I wa

Re: Deprecation of *-gcj packages

2013-04-12 Thread Niels Thykier
On 2013-04-12 13:41, Sylvestre Ledru wrote: > Hello, > Hey, > Maybe I am missing a point but I have the feeling that the -gcj packages > are now a bit useless. > gcj does not seem a very active project [1] and my perception is that > not many people are using gcj packages instead of the "java pa

Re: Deprecation of *-gcj packages

2013-04-12 Thread Mathieu Malaterre
On Fri, Apr 12, 2013 at 1:41 PM, Sylvestre Ledru wrote: > Hello, > > Maybe I am missing a point but I have the feeling that the -gcj packages > are now a bit useless. > gcj does not seem a very active project [1] and my perception is that > not many people are using gcj packages instead > of the "

Deprecation of *-gcj packages

2013-04-12 Thread Sylvestre Ledru
Hello, Maybe I am missing a point but I have the feeling that the -gcj packages are now a bit useless. gcj does not seem a very active project [1] and my perception is that not many people are using gcj packages instead of the "java package". For example, two "famous" java packages providing -gcj