Re: Maven debian helper improvements

2013-03-23 Thread Boris Ribalkin
Hi Thomas, No worries, I am still willing to help this project. Are you saying that I should wait and reintroduce those features on new codebase (I am fine with that)? Did you push here: http://anonscm.debian.org/gitweb/?p=pkg-java/maven-debian-helper.git still do not see changes since last year

Re: NMU for libjsyntaxpane-java?

2013-03-23 Thread Felix Natter
Sylvestre Ledru writes: > On 23/03/2013 14:32, Felix Natter wrote: >> hello, >> >> I would like to start the sponsoring process for the freeplane-1.2.22 >> package, but that requires libjsyntaxpane-java 0.9.6~r156-1. >> >> Martin Quinson (the current libjsyntaxpane-java maintainer) already >> u

Re: Maven debian helper improvements

2013-03-23 Thread Thomas Koch
Boris Ribalkin: > Hi Thomas, > > I did some improvements to mdh related to non interactive mode: > > 1. Package version defaults to maven version. > 2. ignore-missing flag Introduced to ignore not needed libraries to be able > to continue and see if build fails. > 3. mh_make skip test / doc flag

Re: NMU for libjsyntaxpane-java?

2013-03-23 Thread Sylvestre Ledru
On 23/03/2013 14:32, Felix Natter wrote: > hello, > > I would like to start the sponsoring process for the freeplane-1.2.22 > package, but that requires libjsyntaxpane-java 0.9.6~r156-1. > > Martin Quinson (the current libjsyntaxpane-java maintainer) already > updated it and I fixed one problem a

NMU for libjsyntaxpane-java?

2013-03-23 Thread Felix Natter
hello, I would like to start the sponsoring process for the freeplane-1.2.22 package, but that requires libjsyntaxpane-java 0.9.6~r156-1. Martin Quinson (the current libjsyntaxpane-java maintainer) already updated it and I fixed one problem and made sure that it works with the two packages that d

Re: Who still cares about SVN for packaging?

2013-03-23 Thread Andrew Kolotenko
On Sat, 2013-03-23 at 08:53 +0100, Mathieu Malaterre wrote: > Well Thomas is trying to tell us -SVN users- what we should do... > > I'd like to second Sylvestre opinion. I am a very happy SVN user, and > I'd like to keep my package workflow as-is. > > If thomas wants to change the default/prefer

Re: Who still cares about SVN for packaging?

2013-03-23 Thread Mathieu Malaterre
On Sat, Mar 23, 2013 at 12:32 AM, Hilko Bengen wrote: > * Sylvestre Ledru: > >> Asking several times the same question won't help you with that ... >> You should focus on packaging itself. > > Way to go, telling people in a largely volunteer-based community what > their priorities should be... We