On 02/18/2013 04:23 PM, Emmanuel Bourg wrote:
> Le 19/02/2013 01:06, tony mancill a écrit :
>> So within Debian it isn't strictly necessary to list it as an
>> alternative, although we could revisit that if we find that there are
>> JREs commonly being used on Debian systems that only provide the
>
Le 19/02/2013 01:06, tony mancill a écrit :
> So within Debian it isn't strictly necessary to list it as an
> alternative, although we could revisit that if we find that there are
> JREs commonly being used on Debian systems that only provide the
> java7-runtime virtual package.
Actually I was thi
On 02/18/2013 03:29 PM, Emmanuel Bourg wrote:
> Hi Tony,
>
> Le 19/02/2013 00:07, tony mancill a écrit :
>> Just for the record for those interested in tomcat, tomcat 7.0.35 is
>> packaged for Debian and currently uploaded to experimental. The binary
>> package installs and runs fine in wheezy (b
Hi Tony,
Le 19/02/2013 00:07, tony mancill a écrit :
> Just for the record for those interested in tomcat, tomcat 7.0.35 is
> packaged for Debian and currently uploaded to experimental. The binary
> package installs and runs fine in wheezy (by virtue of being an Arch:
> all package). A package f
On 02/18/2013 04:40 AM, Eugene Zhukov wrote:
Hi Eugene,
Thank you for your interest in debian-java. The team welcomes new
contributors!
> e.g. I packaged Tomcat 7.0.33 for my Wheezy as upstream Tomcat 7.0.28 wasn't
> good enough.
Just for the record for those interested in tomcat, tomcat 7.0.3
It seems there is a difference between the dependencies of tomcat6 on
Ubuntu and Debian :
http://packages.ubuntu.com/quantal/tomcat6-common
http://packages.debian.org/squeeze/tomcat6-common
http://packages.debian.org/squeeze/libtomcat6-java
http://packages.debian.org/squeeze/libcommons-dbcp-java
Hi David,
Cedric Pineau reworked java-package last year but I don't think the
updated version is in the Debian repository yet. Could you try this
version instead ?
https://github.com/cedricpineau/java-package
Emmanuel Bourg
Le 18/02/2013 15:36, David Gerard a écrit :
> A quick question, before
David,
Could you give a try at this version of java-package please?
https://github.com/ebourg/java-package
I added the missing dependencies for Ubuntu.
Emmanuel Bourg
smime.p7s
Description: Signature cryptographique S/MIME
Yepp, that's true... PDE-build will be retired. Eclipse Platform plans to
move to "CBI" (the Common Build Infrastructure) with the next Eclipse
Platform release 4.3 (Kepler) in a few months, i.e. that will replace the
old PDE build system.
CBI itself works on top of Tycho/Maven and this should mak
On 2013-02-18 10:53, Niels Thykier wrote:
> On 2013-02-18 10:24, Thomas Koch wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>
> Hi,
>
>> I've looked into the eclipse-wtp package, learned about the jh_* helpers for
>> eclipse and tried to apply them to the wtp-jsf plugin. Some questions:
>>
>> - The JST project comes in an SD
On 18 February 2013 14:59, Emmanuel Bourg wrote:
> Cedric Pineau reworked java-package last year. Could you try this
> version instead (or the one in the experimental repository) ?
> https://github.com/cedricpineau/java-package
That version doesn't claim to provide default-jre-headless either.
Hi David,
Cedric Pineau reworked java-package last year. Could you try this
version instead (or the one in the experimental repository) ?
https://github.com/cedricpineau/java-package
Emmanuel Bourg
Le 18/02/2013 15:36, David Gerard a écrit :
> A quick question, before I proceed to shoot myself
A quick question, before I proceed to shoot myself in the foot:
I'm using make-jpkg to turn Oracle Java into handrolled debs for our use.
I want to test Ubuntu tomcat6 (in Ubuntu 10.04). This tries to pull in
openjdk6. The reason is a dependency on default-jre-headless. I'd
rather it didn't do th
Hi Mathieu,
Thanks for the replay! I do know something about Maven packaging.
Is xslthl stands for libxslthl-java in aptitude? If so, I could start small
and try to
package 2.1 version based on the existing version package 2.0.2-4 and the
source
code from http://xslthl.sourceforge.net?
Br,
Eugene
Hi Eugene,
On Mon, Feb 18, 2013 at 1:40 PM, Eugene Zhukov wrote:
> My name is Eugene Zhukov. I do Java programming for a living and my favorite
> operating system is Debian.
> With that said I do know something about some Java packages in Debian,
> e.g. I packaged Tomcat 7.0.33 for my Wheezy as u
Hello,
My name is Eugene Zhukov. I do Java programming for a living and my favorite
operating system is Debian.
With that said I do know something about some Java packages in Debian,
e.g. I packaged Tomcat 7.0.33 for my Wheezy as upstream Tomcat 7.0.28 wasn't
good enough.
I would be happy to help
On 2013-02-18 13:08, Steven Chamberlain wrote:
> [...]
>> OpenJDK6 therefore should be considered obsolete when Wheezy is released.
>
> I wouldn't use the word 'obsolete' so long as there are packages that
> *can* use it... I'd call it 'maintenance only'.
>
>
> Before deciding the post-wheezy f
On 18/02/13 08:01, Sylvestre Ledru wrote:
> On 18/02/2013 07:26, Andreas Kuckartz wrote:
>> My view as a user:
>> [...]
>> Oracle has announced that no more new public updates of Java SE 6 will
>> be made available after February 2013:
>> http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/java/eol-135779.html
> An
On 18/02/13 05:14, Christoph Egger wrote:
> Matthias Klose writes:
>> - Afaik openjdk-7 for kfreebsd does build on kfreebsd (according to Damien)
>>with the kfreebsd kernel from wheezy. So maybe some commitment could be
>>found to upgrade and maintain the kernels before wheezy is released
On 2013-02-18 10:24, Thomas Koch wrote:
> Hi,
>
Hi,
> I've looked into the eclipse-wtp package, learned about the jh_* helpers for
> eclipse and tried to apply them to the wtp-jsf plugin. Some questions:
>
> - The JST project comes in an SDK and non SDK version. Which one should I
> package?
Hi,
I've looked into the eclipse-wtp package, learned about the jh_* helpers for
eclipse and tried to apply them to the wtp-jsf plugin. Some questions:
- The JST project comes in an SDK and non SDK version. Which one should I
package?
- Do you know a good tutorial on how the eclipse plugins bu
On 18/02/2013 07:26, Andreas Kuckartz wrote:
> Thanks a lot for explaining the situation and alternative paths forward.
>
> My view as a user:
>
> I only want OpenJDK7 (maybe OpenJDK8 when that becomes generally
> available on September 9, 2013 :-)
>
> Oracle has announced that no more new publi
22 matches
Mail list logo
