Thomas Koch writes:
hello Thomas,
> Felix Natter:
>> hi,
>>
>> finally I've imported the source, slightly updated the wiki and fixed
>> the patches for freeplane-1.2.20, but I have some questions:
> It seems that your source tarball contains .class files. Could you please
> push
> your git re
Thomas Koch writes:
> Felix Natter:
>> hi,
hi Thomas,
>> finally I've imported the source, slightly updated the wiki and fixed
>> the patches for freeplane-1.2.20, but I have some questions:
> It seems that your source tarball contains .class files. Could you please
> push
> your git repo to
Felix Natter:
> hi,
>
> finally I've imported the source, slightly updated the wiki and fixed
> the patches for freeplane-1.2.20, but I have some questions:
It seems that your source tarball contains .class files. Could you please push
your git repo to github (or somewhere else) for review?
> -
Hello,
On 19/01/13 15:56, Felix Natter wrote:
Eric Lavarde writes:
Hi,
hi Eric!
finally I am making progress with the freeplane package :-)
Good to hear!
On 01/12/12 14:09, Eric Lavarde wrote:
Back on your issue with get-orig-source, it works like a charm here:
I think I know what
Eric Lavarde writes:
> Hi,
hi Eric!
finally I am making progress with the freeplane package :-)
> On 01/12/12 14:09, Eric Lavarde wrote:
>> Back on your issue with get-orig-source, it works like a charm here:
>
> I think I know what happened: you had already modified the changelog to
> 0.16.05
hi,
finally I've imported the source, slightly updated the wiki and fixed
the patches for freeplane-1.2.20, but I have some questions:
- I thought git-buildpackage (without arguments) would be used to build
intermediate versions of packages? In my case it attempts to sign the
package (for upl
6 matches
Mail list logo
