Hi,
Related to this issue, at least the following packages depend on
openjdk-6 rather than java6-runtime or something less specific. As
such, I found them listed on edos.d.o as uninstallable on kfreebsd-*,
and they would remain so even after we can get openjdk-7 built for those
arches (probably t
Dixi quod…
>If one of you, either java or porter guys, has further suggestions,
>just tell ☺
That includes if I should stop bothering with -6 and try -7
immediately, considering reading about #675495 now. The B-D
are there, nowadays.
The goal might be to make m68k a non-gcj arch, so I don’t
know
Hi,
after my thread from June or so, I’ve started another attempt at
building src:openjdk-6 on m68k. Below is my preliminary patch;
any others will follow.
The patch
• fixes behaviour for s390, which uses gcj-4.6 to bootstrap,
to not depend on gcj-4.7 as well
• adds m68k to gcj-4.6 platforms (t
Hi,
thought you should know about the following error, and I probably
should be building with 'noaltcacao noaltzero noaltshark noaltjamvm'
in DEB_BUILD_OPTIONS… maybe 'nodics' too?
libtool: compile: m68k-linux-gnu-g++ -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I../.. -I../../src
-I../../src/vm/jit/m68k -I../../src/
On Tue, Aug 28, 2012 at 17:43:57 +0200, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote:
> OpenJDK Security support has always been a nightmare for the security
> team because there was no support from the maintainers. Security support
> s primarily the responsibility of the maintainer.
>
> If you dump two packages in
5 matches
Mail list logo
