reassign 553619 java-common
thanks
Le Sun, Nov 01, 2009 at 04:46:56PM +0200, Tom Feiner a écrit :
> Subject: debian-policy: include java policy
> Package: debian-policy
> Version: 3.8.3.0
> Severity: wishlist
>
> Currently, the java policy is provided as part of the java-common
> package. Howeve
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> reassign 553619 java-common
Bug #553619 [debian-policy] debian-policy: include java policy
Bug reassigned from package 'debian-policy' to 'java-common'.
No longer marked as found in versions debian-policy/3.8.3.0.
Ignoring request to alter fixed v
On 2012-08-03 20:04, Jakub Adam wrote:
> Hi Niels,
>
> On 3.8.2012 16:28, Niels Thykier wrote:
>> It fails when building with -us -uc -tc, due to a patch failing to
>> unapply post build (see attached log) !?
>
> This looks like a regression in dpkg-dev that is already reported [1]
> and fixed in
Hi Niels,
On 3.8.2012 16:28, Niels Thykier wrote:
It fails when building with -us -uc -tc, due to a patch failing to
unapply post build (see attached log) !?
This looks like a regression in dpkg-dev that is already reported [1]
and fixed in git [2] (thanks, Thomas!).
Nevertheless, I reworked
Thorsten Glaser writes:
>> relocation truncated to fit: R_68K_GOT16O against `.LC1'
Compile with -fPIC.
Andreas.
--
Andreas Schwab, sch...@linux-m68k.org
GPG Key fingerprint = 58CA 54C7 6D53 942B 1756 01D3 44D5 214B 8276 4ED5
"And now for something completely different."
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE
Damien Raude-Morvan dixit:
> This "Too many levels of symbolic links" is not root cause of failure. In
> fact,
> openjdk $(MAKE) is called twice in case of failure [1] (I don't remember exact
> justification for this...).
Ouch, okay! A *lot* of thanks for spotting that!
> In your log file I can
Niels Thykier dixit:
>I am not how or why, but I think your issue is:
>
> [ -f libjvm.so ] || { ln -s libjvm.so libjvm.so;
> ^^^
> ln -s libjvm.so.1 libjvm.so.1; }; \
> ^^^
Le 03/08/2012 14:36, Thorsten Glaser a écrit :
Hi,
Hi Thorsten,
after doko recommended it to me *way* back then, but only now I’ve
got all of its Build-Depends installable, I’m currently trying to
build src:openjdk-6 (with all references to gcj-4.7 changed back
to gcj-4.6, and, for consistenc
On 2012-07-26 19:41, Jakub Adam wrote:
> Dear java packagers,
>
> I am looking for a sponsor for package "eclipse-linuxtools".
>
> * Package name: eclipse-linuxtools
>Version : 1.1.0-1
>Upstream Author : Eclipse Linux Tools project
>
> * URL : http://www.eclipse
On 2012-08-01 14:22, Jakub Adam wrote:
> Dear java packagers,
>
> I am looking for a sponsor for package "eclipse-mylyn".
>
> * Package name: eclipse-mylyn
>Version : 3.8.1-1
>Upstream Author : Eclipse Mylyn Project
> * URL : http://www.eclipse.org/mylyn
> * Lic
On 2012-08-03 14:36, Thorsten Glaser wrote:
> Hi,
>
> after doko recommended it to me *way* back then, but only now I’ve
> got all of its Build-Depends installable, I’m currently trying to
> build src:openjdk-6 (with all references to gcj-4.7 changed back
> to gcj-4.6, and, for consistency, the sa
11 matches
Mail list logo
