On 01/01/2012 10:00 PM, Cédric Pineau wrote:
> To build upon several threads regarding java-package, I've played with it
> on my side with the hope it could find his way back in debian (I too need
> clean installs of Oracle java on debian, should it only be because it's
> Oracle one and companies/p
Cédric Pineau writes:
> Do you, debian developpers and java-package authors, think this "trimmed
> and renewed" version could be a new start for java-package ?
> Is it desirable for debian to offer a tool that ease the use of non free
> software like Oracle JVM ? (
> http://lists.debian.org/debia
Package: java-common
Version: 0.46
Severity: minor
User: m...@qa.debian.org
Usertags: mia-teammaint
Michael Koch has not been working on
the java-common package for quite some time.
We are tracking their status in the MIA team and would like to ask you
to remove them from the Uploaders list of t
2012/1/1 David Gerard
> Looking at it, it no longer seems to support Oracle Java 6. Speaking
> as a prospective user, it would be wonderful if it did :-) Oracle Java
> 6 is still a current version, it hasn't been EOLed.
>
>
You're right, I removed it to get a clean start, but putting it back is
2012/1/1 Cédric Pineau :
> Do you, debian developpers and java-package authors, think this "trimmed and
> renewed" version could be a new start for java-package ?
> Is it desirable for debian to offer a tool that ease the use of non free
> software like Oracle JVM ?
> (http://lists.debian.org/debi
To build upon several threads regarding java-package, I've played with it
on my side with the hope it could find his way back in debian (I too need
clean installs of Oracle java on debian, should it only be because it's
Oracle one and companies/people don't want to hear about subtle
differences, th
6 matches
Mail list logo
