Re: RFS: eclipse (new upstream release with Java 7 support)

2011-12-31 Thread Ben Hutchings
On Sat, 2011-12-31 at 11:43 +0100, Arnaud Patard wrote: > Matthias Klose writes: > Hi, > > > On 12/30/2011 11:23 PM, Jakub Adam wrote: > >>> on which platforms? i.e. are the "architecture templates" updated to > >>> build on > >>> more than amd64 and i386? > >> > >> There are arm, ia64, mips, p

Re: Copyright on Debian scripts in non-free Sun JRE?

2011-12-31 Thread Russ Allbery
David Gerard writes: > It occurs to me there must have been some semi-automated way to produce > the recent Oracle Java packages. Were these done with java-package, or > by some other means? Because duplicating that setup would, of course, > produce debs just right to replace the debs of old Sun

Re: RFS: eclipse (new upstream release with Java 7 support)

2011-12-31 Thread Benjamin Drung
Am Freitag, den 30.12.2011, 17:06 +0100 schrieb Jakub Adam: > Hi Benjamin, > > > debian/extra/eclipse adds a wrong updatesite > > Changed URL to Indigo update site. > > I also changed a bit the way how files to be updated are searched, because > when I run Eclipse for the first time, two files w

Re: RFS: eclipse (new upstream release with Java 7 support)

2011-12-31 Thread Rtp
Matthias Klose writes: Hi, > On 12/30/2011 11:23 PM, Jakub Adam wrote: >>> on which platforms? i.e. are the "architecture templates" updated to build >>> on >>> more than amd64 and i386? >> >> There are arm, ia64, mips, ppc and sparc in the additional architectures - >> see >> contents of >> d

Re: Copyright on Debian scripts in non-free Sun JRE?

2011-12-31 Thread David Gerard
On 31 December 2011 01:36, Russ Allbery wrote: > While this doesn't directly solve your problem, the Debian package > java-package was designed to do exactly what you're doing and is therefore > under a clear license in that respect.  Maybe it's worth taking a look at > it and seeing if it can be