On 09/26/2011 11:13 PM, Sylvestre Ledru wrote:
> Well, at build time, I understand but how do you do at runtime ? There
> are programs which need to guess the actual path and which won't depend
> on our java wrappers...
which ones? and how do these guess the VM used?
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email t
Le lundi 26 septembre 2011 à 20:00 +0200, Matthias Klose a écrit :
> On 09/26/2011 07:41 PM, Torsten Werner wrote:
> > On Mon, Sep 26, 2011 at 2:53 PM, Matthias Klose wrote:
> >> hmm, on second thought, I think this looks wrong. at build time you always
> >> have
> >> the output of dpkg-architect
Am Sonntag, den 25.09.2011, 15:43 +0200 schrieb Torsten Werner:
> Hi,
>
> I've touched many packages in the past weeks and found several package
> that I could not change easily or could not change at all. That is not
> the idea behind Debian - to make changes hard. That is why I have
> started wr
On 2011-09-26 17:07, Florian Weimer wrote:
> I'm trying to backport Eclipse from experimental to a squeeze-based
> distribution. I would like to relax the build dependencies for Lucene,
> but this appears to be problematic. Currently, I get this error:
>
> [symlinkOSGiJars] Export-Package attrib
On 09/26/2011 07:41 PM, Torsten Werner wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 26, 2011 at 2:53 PM, Matthias Klose wrote:
>> hmm, on second thought, I think this looks wrong. at build time you always
>> have
>> the output of dpkg-architecture -qDEB_HOST_MULTIARCH available, so you can
>> adjust it. At runtime that
On Mon, Sep 26, 2011 at 2:53 PM, Matthias Klose wrote:
> hmm, on second thought, I think this looks wrong. at build time you always
> have
> the output of dpkg-architecture -qDEB_HOST_MULTIARCH available, so you can
> adjust it. At runtime that should be handled by all our different java
> wrap
I'm trying to backport Eclipse from experimental to a squeeze-based
distribution. I would like to relax the build dependencies for Lucene,
but this appears to be problematic. Currently, I get this error:
[symlinkOSGiJars] Export-Package attributes do not match for
org.apache.lucene.analysis
I
On 09/25/2011 10:28 PM, Matthias Klose wrote:
> On 09/25/2011 08:54 PM, Torsten Werner wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> openjdk-6-jre-headless now doesn't use java-6-openjdk anymore. so with
>> the
>> appropriate conflicts, this symlink can be moved to default-jre-headless.
>>
>> I do not think tha
8 matches
Mail list logo