Re: GWT2 packaging

2011-09-01 Thread Charles Plessy
Le Fri, Sep 02, 2011 at 07:42:37AM +0200, Alexandre Rossi a écrit : > > I'll now share my work at the following URL: > http://sousmonlit.dyndns.org/~niol/gitweb/?p=gwt-debian.git/.git;a=summary > > This also should work : > $ git clone > http://sousmonlit.dyndns.org/~niol/repositories.git/gwt-de

Re: GWT2 packaging

2011-09-01 Thread Alexandre Rossi
> I would probably not use "org.eclipse.jdt.core_3.5.2.v_981_R35x.jar", > since the last part of a version in eclipse jars has been known to be > volatile. Done. > Consider a wildcard like "org.eclipse.jdt.core_3.5.2.*.jar" and please > check it works with eclipse 3.7 (in experimental). It buil

Re: GWT2 packaging

2011-09-01 Thread Alexandre Rossi
Hi all, I'll now share my work at the following URL: http://sousmonlit.dyndns.org/~niol/gitweb/?p=gwt-debian.git/.git;a=summary This also should work : $ git clone http://sousmonlit.dyndns.org/~niol/repositories.git/gwt-debian.git/.git (git is easier to work with without commit access, I'll con

Re: openjdk-6 and openjdk-7 multiarch installable

2011-09-01 Thread Matthias Klose
On 09/01/2011 10:46 PM, Torsten Werner wrote: On Wed, Aug 31, 2011 at 11:38 PM, Matthias Klose wrote: why deleting the remainder of the email and not reading the email up to the end? JAVA_HOME=/usr/lib/jvm/java-1.6.0-openjdk is the answer? I believe that we will see some FTBFS problems. But m

Re: java-access-bridge official packaging source ?

2011-09-01 Thread Damien Raude-Morvan
Le mercredi 31 août 2011 00:36:29, Matthias Klose a écrit : > On 08/31/2011 12:12 AM, Damien Raude-Morvan wrote: > > Le mercredi 31 août 2011 00:03:26, Torsten Werner a écrit : > >> we should try to merge doko's changes back into our SVN repo. Do you > >> need help? > > > > Ok, I finally found dok

RFS: libswingx1-java

2011-09-01 Thread Andrew Ross
Dear Debian Java Team members, I am looking for a sponsor for my new package libswingx1-java. This is a new package, but is basically just the libswingx-java package at version 1. There were some fairly major API changes between 1.0 and the next version (1.6), and so the current version isn't full

Re: openjdk-6 and openjdk-7 multiarch installable

2011-09-01 Thread Sylvestre Ledru
Le jeudi 01 septembre 2011 à 22:46 +0200, Torsten Werner a écrit : > On Wed, Aug 31, 2011 at 11:38 PM, Matthias Klose wrote: > > why deleting the remainder of the email and not reading the email up to the > > end? > > JAVA_HOME=/usr/lib/jvm/java-1.6.0-openjdk is the answer? I believe > that we wi

Re: openjdk-6 and openjdk-7 multiarch installable

2011-09-01 Thread Torsten Werner
On Wed, Aug 31, 2011 at 11:38 PM, Matthias Klose wrote: > why deleting the remainder of the email and not reading the email up to the > end? JAVA_HOME=/usr/lib/jvm/java-1.6.0-openjdk is the answer? I believe that we will see some FTBFS problems. But maybe that it might a good reason the switch to

Re: Bug#639954: azureus: FTBFS (multiarch breakage)

2011-09-01 Thread Damien Raude-Morvan
Le jeudi 01 septembre 2011 02:19:01, Adrian Bunk a écrit : > On Thu, Sep 01, 2011 at 02:03:36AM +0200, Damien Raude-Morvan wrote: > > Adrian, > > > > Please, don't start MBF without checking first with debian-devel (or in > > this > > > > case with debian-java) : > >... > > I am not doing mass bu