Re: Bug#639954: azureus: FTBFS (multiarch breakage)

2011-08-31 Thread Adrian Bunk
On Thu, Sep 01, 2011 at 02:03:36AM +0200, Damien Raude-Morvan wrote: > Adrian, > > Please, don't start MBF without checking first with debian-devel (or in this > case with debian-java) : >... I am not doing mass bug filing, I just sent bug reports for the two packages where I personally ran int

Re: Bug#639954: azureus: FTBFS (multiarch breakage)

2011-08-31 Thread Damien Raude-Morvan
Adrian, Please, don't start MBF without checking first with debian-devel (or in this case with debian-java) : it's not only java-access-bridge and azureus but many more packages. Debian Java Team is fully aware that recent changes in openjdk-6 / openjdk-7 makes roughly 60+ packages FTBFS. Le j

Re: openjdk-6 and openjdk-7 multiarch installable

2011-08-31 Thread Matthias Klose
On 08/31/2011 11:13 PM, Torsten Werner wrote: Hi Matthias, On Wed, Aug 31, 2011 at 12:52 AM, Matthias Klose wrote: The path /usr/lib/jvm/java-6-openjdk isn't valid anymore. It currently only contains common jar files. which path should we use now if we want to use openjdk-6 explicitely? w

Re: openjdk-6 and openjdk-7 multiarch installable

2011-08-31 Thread Torsten Werner
Hi Matthias, On Wed, Aug 31, 2011 at 12:52 AM, Matthias Klose wrote: > The path /usr/lib/jvm/java-6-openjdk isn't valid anymore.  It currently only > contains common jar files. which path should we use now if we want to use openjdk-6 explicitely? Cheers, Torsten -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to de

Re: orphaning git-maintained packages

2011-08-31 Thread Torsten Werner
On Wed, Aug 31, 2011 at 7:00 PM, Mehdi Dogguy wrote: > Not doing anything? Or, instead make an mr-list of repositories for > non-orpahned packages. > > IIUC, it is (almost) mandatory to do for SVN maintained packages, because > you may not want to checkout those repositories. But, that doesn't sta

Re: orphaning git-maintained packages

2011-08-31 Thread Mehdi Dogguy
On 31/08/2011 00:21, Torsten Werner wrote: > Hi, > > I've asked myself what should happen to a git repo after orphaning a > package? It is easy with subversion: we just move the directory from > trunk/ into ../old/. I want to suggest to move a git repo to the > /home/groups/pkg-java/OLDGIT/ dir

Re: GWT2 packaging

2011-08-31 Thread Niels Thykier
On 2011-08-31 18:46, Alexandre Rossi wrote: > Dear all, > > Please find attached a patch against the current packaging svn > svn://svn.debian.org/pkg-eucalyptus/gwt/trunk . > > It make it possible to build gwt-dev.jar . > > I'll continue working towards building gwt-user.jar (when I get the > ch

Re: GWT2 packaging

2011-08-31 Thread Alexandre Rossi
Dear all, Please find attached a patch against the current packaging svn svn://svn.debian.org/pkg-eucalyptus/gwt/trunk . It make it possible to build gwt-dev.jar . I'll continue working towards building gwt-user.jar (when I get the chance), but I wanted to share my work in case people were tackl