to end this adventure (installing eclipse on testing) :
adding unstable in sources.list and #apt-get install eclipse -t unstable
>gave me an error "E: internal error, could not perform immediate
configuration (2) on perl"
it's a perl error seems but was tired to sort it out, it's "UNSTABLE" after
a
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Torsten Werner
* Package name: libjsoup-java
Version : 1.6.1
Upstream Author : Jonathan Hedley
* URL : http://jsoup.org/
* License : MIT
Programming Lang: Java
Description : Java HTML parser that makes sense of re
On Sun, Aug 28, 2011 at 06:48:11PM +, Debian FTP Masters wrote:
> default-jdk-doc_0.43_all.deb
> to main/j/java-common/default-jdk-doc_0.43_all.deb
> default-jdk_1.6-43_amd64.deb
> to main/j/java-common/default-jdk_1.6-43_amd64.deb
> default-jdk_1.6-43_i386.deb
> to main/j/java-common/def
On Mon, Aug 29, 2011 at 12:33 PM, Eric Delcamp wrote:
> ok guys, thanks for your answers.
> i still feel would be nice to have eclipse on testing without adding
> unstable but i'll follow your advices.
If you check the PTS you can find out why:
http://packages.qa.debian.org/e/eclipse.html
http:/
ok guys, thanks for your answers.
i still feel would be nice to have eclipse on testing without adding
unstable but i'll follow your advices.
take care,
Eric
On Mon, Aug 29, 2011 at 10:51 AM, Niels Thykier wrote:
> On 2011-08-29 10:25, Eric Delcamp wrote:
> > yes indeed i think i'll end to inst
On Mon, Aug 29, 2011 at 9:51 AM, Niels Thykier wrote:
> I personally have both "unstable" and "testing" in my sources list and use:
>
> """
> $ cat /etc/apt/apt.conf.d/02aptlocal
> APT::Default-Release "testing";
> """
I personally prefer pinning for this. I have set it up such that when
I cherr
On 2011-08-29 10:25, Eric Delcamp wrote:
> yes indeed i think i'll end to install it from unstable, but i'll switch
> back to testing, i don't want to stay on unstable.
>
> but easiest would be to have it on testing, no ?
> in fact i was ported on testing, but then removed 09AUG11 :
> http://packa
Eric Delcamp:
> yes indeed i think i'll end to install it from unstable, but i'll switch
> back to testing, i don't want to stay on unstable.
>
> but easiest would be to have it on testing, no ?
> in fact i was ported on testing, but then removed 09AUG11 :
> http://packages.qa.debian.org/e/eclipse
yes indeed i think i'll end to install it from unstable, but i'll switch
back to testing, i don't want to stay on unstable.
but easiest would be to have it on testing, no ?
in fact i was ported on testing, but then removed 09AUG11 :
http://packages.qa.debian.org/e/eclipse.html
On Mon, Aug 29, 2
Hum... sorry but this official page ( http://www.debian.org/releases/ )
tells that :
The current stable distribution of Debian is version 6.0, codenamed *squeeze
*.
The current testing distribution is *wheezy*.
On Mon, Aug 29, 2011 at 10:07 AM, Thomas Koch wrote:
> Hi Eric,
>
> debian-java@l
Eric Delcamp:
> Hum... sorry but this official page ( http://www.debian.org/releases/ )
> tells that :
>
> The current stable distribution of Debian is version 6.0, codenamed
> *squeeze *.
Shii... You're right of course. I got confused. But since you're on testing it
would be easiest for you to
Hi Eric,
debian-java@lists.debian.org is the list to go. I forward your message.
> hello, seems that generic package "eclipse" doesn't exists on "testing"
> (wheezy)
> i have on my sources.lists only testing main contrib non-free and it's
> stuck to 3.2.2-6.1 even if squeeze is on 3.5.
> i could
12 matches
Mail list logo
