Le vendredi 19 août 2011 à 18:45 +0200, Mathieu Malaterre a écrit :
> Here is what I now get after removing qdox :
>
> /tmp/buildd/fop-1.0.dfsg/src/codegen/java/org/apache/fop/tools/EventProducerCollectorTask.java
> [javac] EventProducerCollector.java:35: package
> com.thoughtworks.qdox does
Me passe um endereço de repositório debian versão lenny antiga do samba,
estou tendo problemas no compartilhamento com a versão nova.
-Mensagem original-
De: Aurelien Jarno [mailto:aurel...@aurel32.net]
Enviada em: quarta-feira, 10 de agosto de 2011 18:59
Para: Damien Raude-Morvan
Cc: deb
Here is what I now get after removing qdox :
resourcegen:
[mkdir] Created dir: /tmp/buildd/fop-1.0.dfsg/build/codegen-classes
[javac] /tmp/buildd/fop-1.0.dfsg/build.xml:354: warning:
'includeantruntime' was not set, defaulting to
build.sysclasspath=last; set to false for repeatable builds
Hi Mathieu,
Am 19.08.2011 16:12, schrieb Mathieu Malaterre:
> You must specify a valid ANT_HOME directory!
I cannot reproduce this error in a sid chroot. But I get a null pointer
exception when building version 1.0-4. I could fix that by removing qdox
from Build-Depends and DEB_JARS.
Torsten
-
Torsten Werner writes:
> On Fri, Aug 19, 2011 at 2:11 PM, Michael Bramer wrote:
>> ! Description: Standard Java or Java compatible Runtime
>> ! This package points to the Java runtime, or Java compatible
>> ! runtime recommended for the ${jre:arch} architecture,
>> ! which is ${jre} for ${jre
Dear all,
I am trying to upload the latest version of fop. However I cannot
get it to simply to compile anymore:
$ cd ~/debian/pkg-java/trunk/fop
$ svn up
$ svn-buildpackage --svn-dont-purge --svn-lintian --svn-ignore-new
--svn-builder="pdebuild --buildresult `pwd`/../build-area"
Complete layo
On Fri, Aug 19, 2011 at 01:28:59PM +0100, Jonathan Wiltshire wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 19, 2011 at 02:11:27PM +0200, Michael Bramer wrote:
> > - This make extra load for the translation of this description.
>
> It does and for that reason I'm including debian-i18n in this discussion.
> For the record
Hi,
On Fri, Aug 19, 2011 at 2:11 PM, Michael Bramer wrote:
> ! Description: Standard Java or Java compatible Runtime
> ! This package points to the Java runtime, or Java compatible
> ! runtime recommended for the ${jre:arch} architecture,
> ! which is ${jre} for ${jre:arch}.
the interesting p
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-java-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive:
http://lists.debian.org/caf-vuaxslxt4uehoxtnjx-ya7p6xnnwbufjdt+1qe-pf4-t...@mail.gmail.com
Hello
If you look a the control file from java-common-0.40, you found
something like this:
! Package: default-jre
! Architecture: any
! Depends: default-jre-headless (= ${binary:Version}), ${jre}${jre:version},
! ${misc:Depends}
! Provides: ${jre:provides}
! Description: Standard Java or Java c
On Fri, Aug 19, 2011 at 02:11:27PM +0200, Michael Bramer wrote:
> - This make extra load for the translation of this description.
It does and for that reason I'm including debian-i18n in this discussion.
For the record I support the idea that dynamic descriptions should be
discouraged unless ther
11 matches
Mail list logo
