On 06/02/2011 01:41 PM, James Page wrote:
> Hi All
>
> I am looking for a sponsor for the new package "guava-libraries".
>
> * Package name: guava-libraries
> Version : 09-1
> Upstream Author : Google Inc.
> * URL : http://code.google.com/p/guava-libraries/
> * License
On 2011-06-04 19:39, tony mancill wrote:
> On 06/04/2011 09:49 AM, Niels Thykier wrote:
>> [...]
>>
>> Appears to have been sponsored by tmancill.
>>
>> ~Niels
>
> Yes - sorry I didn't post back to the list about sponsoring libjna-java and
> tiger-types. I traded emails with the packagers respect
On 06/03/2011 11:21 PM, Onkar Shinde wrote:
> On 6/4/11, Vincent Fourmond wrote:
>> On Fri, Jun 3, 2011 at 7:31 PM, tony mancill wrote:
>>> Hi Onkar,
>>>
>>> I'll sponsor the upload, but 1 small thing with this update.
>>>
>>> The new package ships 2 separate JAR files in usr/share/java/ instead
On 06/04/2011 09:49 AM, Niels Thykier wrote:
> On 2011-06-03 19:45, Andrew Ross wrote:
>> Dear mentors,
>>
>> I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 3.2.7-4
>> of my package "libjna-java".
>>
>> It builds these binary packages:
>> libjna-java - Dynamic access of native libraries from Java w
On 2011-06-03 19:45, Andrew Ross wrote:
> Dear mentors,
>
> I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 3.2.7-4
> of my package "libjna-java".
>
> It builds these binary packages:
> libjna-java - Dynamic access of native libraries from Java without JNI
> libjna-java-doc - Dynamic access of nat
On 2011-06-01 12:43, James Page wrote:
> Hi All
>
> I am looking for a sponsor for my package "tiger-types".
>
> * Package name: tiger-types
> Version : 1.3-1
> Upstream Author : Kohsuke Kawaguchi
> * URL : http://java.net/projects/tiger-types
> * License : CD
On 06/04/2011 04:36 AM, Niels Thykier wrote:
> On 2011-06-04 08:21, Onkar Shinde wrote:
>> On 6/4/11, Vincent Fourmond wrote:
>>> On Fri, Jun 3, 2011 at 7:31 PM, tony mancill wrote:
Hi Onkar,
I'll sponsor the upload, but 1 small thing with this update.
The new package shi
On 2011-06-04 14:43, Eric Lavarde wrote:
> On 04/06/11 14:07, Niels Thykier wrote:
>>> A strange thing is that Lintian does only complain about
>>> freeplaneeditor.jar and not about the other jar files!?
>>>
>>
>> It complains about the "../" part in freeplaneeditor.jar, which would be
>> a relativ
On 04/06/11 14:07, Niels Thykier wrote:
A strange thing is that Lintian does only complain about
freeplaneeditor.jar and not about the other jar files!?
It complains about the "../" part in freeplaneeditor.jar, which would be
a relative path to a directory, which seems to be a genuine issue.
B
On 2011-06-04 13:27, Eric Lavarde wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I'm not a big OSGi specialist, but let me give back what I understand:
>
> On 04/06/11 12:16, Niels Thykier wrote:
>>> [...]
>> Lintian already skips the Class-Path check if the Manifest has a
>> Bundle-SymbolicName entry (which all OSGi bundl
On 2011-06-04 08:21, Onkar Shinde wrote:
> On 6/4/11, Vincent Fourmond wrote:
>> On Fri, Jun 3, 2011 at 7:31 PM, tony mancill wrote:
>>> Hi Onkar,
>>>
>>> I'll sponsor the upload, but 1 small thing with this update.
>>>
>>> The new package ships 2 separate JAR files in usr/share/java/ instead of
Hello,
I'm not a big OSGi specialist, but let me give back what I understand:
On 04/06/11 12:16, Niels Thykier wrote:
2. my actual problem is that the classpath is actually not needed by
> Freeplane because it uses Knopflerfish / OSGi framework which resolves
> itself dependencies based on
>
On 2011-06-04 09:52, Eric Lavarde wrote:
> Hello,
>
> while repackaging Freeplane, I noticed that there a few new Lintian
> checks in regard to Java...
>
> I had first the warning:
>
> W: freeplane: classpath-contains-relative-path
> usr/share/freeplane/core/org.freeplane.core/lib/freeplaneedito
Hello,
while repackaging Freeplane, I noticed that there a few new Lintian
checks in regard to Java...
I had first the warning:
W: freeplane: classpath-contains-relative-path
usr/share/freeplane/core/org.freeplane.core/lib/freeplaneeditor.jar: ../
freeplaneeditor.jar freeplaneviewer.jar fre
On Fri, 2011-06-03 at 22:18 -0700, tony mancill wrote:
>
> The package looks good to me. Before uploading it to the NEW queue, I
> think we should list Jan Materne and Mark Sinke to debian/copyright.
> Their names are listed in pom.xml, project.xml
> and ./xdocs/changes.xml,
> and so I assume tha
15 matches
Mail list logo