Re: RFS: libcodemodel-java (updated package)

2011-05-04 Thread Damien Raude-Morvan
Le mercredi 04 mai 2011 10:13:30, James Page a écrit : > On Wed, 2011-05-04 at 08:41 +0100, James Page wrote: > > > - You should document switch to 3.0 (quiltà source format in > > > d/changelog > > > > Actioned; I'll upload a new version to mentors in the next hour or so. > > Uploaded - I also m

Re: Help needed: Bug#625562: figtree: fails to start

2011-05-04 Thread Russ Allbery
Andreas Tille writes: > So what is the proper / suggested fix? I see two options: > 1. Use a shell wrapper instead. > 2. Enforce binfmt_misc somehow (if yes - how?) > I wonder how other packages which are using the same technique are solving > this problem. I'm pretty sure that we enable

Re: Help needed: Bug#625562: figtree: fails to start

2011-05-04 Thread Andreas Tille
On Wed, May 04, 2011 at 12:17:55PM -0700, Russ Allbery wrote: > /usr/bin/figtree is a symlink to an executable JAR file. Yes, this is what I have seen in other packages and what seemed to me some suggested way to go. > I believe in > order for executable JAR files to be passed to Java properly, t

Re: Help needed: Bug#625562: figtree: fails to start

2011-05-04 Thread Russ Allbery
Andreas Tille writes: > I have no idea how to track down this problem because I can not reproduce > it. Does it sound somehow familiar for a known problem? /usr/bin/figtree is a symlink to an executable JAR file. I believe in order for executable JAR files to be passed to Java properly, the us

Help needed: Bug#625562: figtree: fails to start

2011-05-04 Thread Andreas Tille
Hi, I have no idea how to track down this problem because I can not reproduce it. Does it sound somehow familiar for a known problem? Thanks for any hint Andreas. - Forwarded message from Carlos Reding - X-Debian-PR-Message: followup 625562 X-Debian-PR-Package: figtree X-Debi

Re: Problems with many POMs in the same package

2011-05-04 Thread Giovanni Mascellani
Hi Ludovic. On 19/02/2011 23:55, Ludovic Claude wrote: > > Hello Giovanni, > > It looks like your package manages to defeat my weak dependency > resolution algorithm. No problems, I will fix that, it will take a bit > of time. Did you manage to get any progress on that? It doesn't seem that any

Re: RFS: lwjgl

2011-05-04 Thread Niels Thykier
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On 2011-04-08 20:03, Michael Gilbert wrote: > [...] > > Hi, > > I pushed these updates a few days ago. Let me know if I need to do > anything else. > > Thanks for reviewing, > Mike > > Hi I finally got around to have a look at it: - Lintian

Re: RFS: libcodemodel-java (updated package)

2011-05-04 Thread James Page
On Wed, 2011-05-04 at 08:41 +0100, James Page wrote: > > - You should document switch to 3.0 (quiltà source format in > > d/changelog > > Actioned; I'll upload a new version to mentors in the next hour or so. > > Uploaded - I also merge the UNRELEASED changelog entry into 2.1-1 as requested by

Re: RFS: libcodemodel-java (updated package)

2011-05-04 Thread James Page
Hi Damien On Wed, 2011-05-04 at 01:19 +0200, Damien Raude-Morvan wrote: > I've just some small comments before uploading: > - What's the purpose of "* * maven-plugin * * *" line in > debian/maven.rules ? Good spot - that's completely superfluous so I have removed. Not sure how that crept in. > -