On Sat, Feb 12, 2011 at 9:19 PM, Scott Howard wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 12, 2011 at 1:45 PM, Andreas Tille wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I uploaded two source packages to
>>
>> http://people.debian.org/~tille/packages/figtree-help-wanted/
>>
>> One is the just ITPed (#613080) and the other one is FigTree whic
On Sat, Feb 12, 2011 at 1:45 PM, Andreas Tille wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I uploaded two source packages to
>
> http://people.debian.org/~tille/packages/figtree-help-wanted/
>
> One is the just ITPed (#613080) and the other one is FigTree which is
> actually my target package. The originial tarball conta
1. SMS Offers
10,000 SMS @ 0.10 AED per sms
Free Software
Total: 1,000/- AED
2. Business Email Database Offer
Business Directory 2011 with approx 400,000 Contacts Database for AED
200/- only.
3. Tailor made Web Hosting Business Plan to suit every kind of website
All Inclusive Busines
Hi.
On 12/02/2011 19:02, Vincent Fourmond wrote:
> A question: do you think it is a good idea to update the
> debian/control Vcs fields to point to the branch directory ? My
> opinion is that it should be, so that the control file of the package
> uploaded to squeeze-security corresponds to the
On Sat, Feb 12, 2011 at 7:45 PM, Andreas Tille wrote:
> I uploaded two source packages to
>
> http://people.debian.org/~tille/packages/figtree-help-wanted/
>
> One is the just ITPed (#613080) and the other one is FigTree which is
> actually my target package. The originial tarball contained a j
Hi,
I uploaded two source packages to
http://people.debian.org/~tille/packages/figtree-help-wanted/
One is the just ITPed (#613080) and the other one is FigTree which is
actually my target package. The originial tarball contained a jebl.jar
which I stripped from the tarball. I assumed that
Hi,
see below ITP of JEBL which I would like to maintain in Debian Med team.
However checking the package by Debian Java team would be welcome.
Kind regards
Andreas.
- Forwarded message from andr...@an3as.eu -
From: andr...@an3as.eu
To: Debian Bug Tracking System
Subject: ITP: jeb
On Sat, Feb 12, 2011 at 6:51 PM, tony mancill wrote:
> Are there established practices (i.e. naming conventions) for branching
> in the SVN repo in order to provide support over the lifetime of stable?
>
> I need to prepare a security update for tomcat6 for squeeze and would
> like to continue to
Are there established practices (i.e. naming conventions) for branching
in the SVN repo in order to provide support over the lifetime of stable?
I need to prepare a security update for tomcat6 for squeeze and would
like to continue to use the SVN repo, but also want to move forward for
unstable.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 2011-02-08 15:06, Niels Thykier wrote:
> Hey
>
> Now that Squeeze is out, I was thinking that we could look at some of
> the things that we would like to get done for Wheezy. During Squeeze I
> compiled a short list of things I would have liked t
10 matches
Mail list logo