On 09/02/2011 06:12, tony mancill wrote:
>> etc. So it seems either that nobody cares about getting these fine
>> (and popular) applications into Debian, or it's just too hard to do
>> given the current set of policies.
>
> I think this is a fair point. It *is* very difficult to package
> large J
tony mancill writes:
> What I hope to see happen is that Debian will continue to package more
> and more of the popular Java libraries needed for these applications and
> frameworks, to the point where Debian becomes a development platform of
> choice because (a) it's less work to apt-get everyth
On 02/08/2011 11:46 AM, Stefane Fermigier wrote:
> On Feb 8, 2011, at 8:14 PM, Vincent Fourmond wrote:
>>
>> My point is not to discourage you or express scorn or whichever
>> negative view on Nuxeo, but just to state the sine qua none conditions
>> for a package to enter Debian.
>
> Out of curios
Sera que habra alguna forma de controlar el envio de spam que algunos
subcritos a la lista envian
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-java-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/1297219660.190
Hi,
I've some overlap with your own goals Torsten :)
Le mardi 08 février 2011 17:07:13, Torsten Werner a écrit :
> - Port openjdk to kfreebsd with either hotspot or jamvm.
kibi, tuco and I tried and, AFAIK, we all failed.
Have you started working on this ? from upstream "bsd-port" mercurial fore
Bonjour Stéfane :)
Le mardi 08 février 2011 20:46:27, Stefane Fermigier a écrit :
> On Feb 8, 2011, at 8:14 PM, Vincent Fourmond wrote:
> > My point is not to discourage you or express scorn or whichever
> > negative view on Nuxeo, but just to state the sine qua none conditions
> > for a package t
On Feb 8, 2011, at 8:25 PM, Andrew Ross wrote:
> Hi Julian,
>
> Others have covered the constraints for getting your package into
> Debian. There is one possible alternative you might consider if the work
> to package into Debian is too time consuming. You could publish your own
> apt repository
On Feb 8, 2011, at 8:14 PM, Vincent Fourmond wrote:
>
> My point is not to discourage you or express scorn or whichever
> negative view on Nuxeo, but just to state the sine qua none conditions
> for a package to enter Debian.
Out of curiosity, how many large Java application are currently package
Hi Julian,
Others have covered the constraints for getting your package into
Debian. There is one possible alternative you might consider if the work
to package into Debian is too time consuming. You could publish your own
apt repository containing your package. This would require users to add
you
[CCing you as I don't know if you have subscribed to debian-java]
Hello,
On Tue, Feb 8, 2011 at 6:34 PM, Julien CARSIQUE wrote:
> About versions and shared resources, sharing libraries is nice but not
> always reliable and, tell me if I'm wrong, I guess a lot of Debian
> applications are bring
Le mardi 08 février 2011 à 17:07 +0100, Torsten Werner a écrit :
> Hi,
> - Find code duplication. Dak may help as soon as it has package contents
> in its database.
Great news!
> - OpenJDK 7?
With Tom Marble, we would like to propose a GSOC about jigsaw.
> - Organize a Java team meeting. Maybe ne
Hello,
I'm a maintainer of Nuxeo distributions.
We want to give Debian users an easy access to our open source (LGPL) products.
That means being able to publish Debian
packages into on of your repositories.
As far as I understand the case, the issue lies into the gap between two build
and pack
Hi,
I'll probably continue working on dak. That is why I won't have too much
time for Java but...
- Get JRuby uploaded to main.
- Port openjdk to kfreebsd with either hotspot or jamvm.
- Ship more pom files.
- Find code duplication. Dak may help as soon as it has package contents
in its database.
Hello,
On Tue, Feb 8, 2011 at 3:06 PM, Niels Thykier wrote:
> Now that Squeeze is out, I was thinking that we could look at some of
> the things that we would like to get done for Wheezy. During Squeeze I
> compiled a short list of things I would have liked to have done for
> Squeeze or things
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Hey
Now that Squeeze is out, I was thinking that we could look at some of
the things that we would like to get done for Wheezy. During Squeeze I
compiled a short list of things I would have liked to have done for
Squeeze or things that appeared very
Preciso configurar novamente minha lista de repositorio qual uma melhor
lista.
- Original Message -
From: "Damien Raude-Morvan"
To:
Sent: Wednesday, July 14, 2010 3:10 PM
Subject: Re: RFC : update to our website (on Alioth)
Le mercredi 14 juillet 2010 18:52:54, Damien Raude-Morvan a
Hi Vincent.
On 31/01/2011 23:47, Vincent Fourmond wrote:
> As far as I'm concerned, I don't have any objection to either of you
> modifying the package and uploading that.
The new version of osmosis I'm working on also requires a more recent
version of libwoodstox. Any problem if I package it?
Hi.
On 07/02/2011 20:27, Andreas Tille wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 07, 2011 at 07:56:13PM +0100, Giovanni Mascellani wrote:
>> The right list for discussion Java-related stuff is debian-java@l.d.o.
>
> Now using proper list - and thanks for the CC - I'm not (yet) subscribed.
Still keeping you in Cc: un
18 matches
Mail list logo
