Super! Paruirs ir malacis - vinsh sataisija manu portaalu!
Esmu tiesham seksiga latvieshu meitene. Esmu laba pornozvaigzne. Ja velies, tad
nem veraa, ka tagad ir atverts pirmais, man veltitais, portals latviesu valoda.
Ienaac un ieveertee 4 labakaas filmas no manas kolekcijas. Profesionalju
m
> Regarding the dependencies that you set:
> libgtk2.0-dev (>= 2.22) (http://packages.qa.debian.org/g/gtk+2.0.html) &
> libcairo2-dev (>= 1.10) (http://packages.qa.debian.org/c/cairo.html)
> it implies Debian experimental.
Oh right, I forgot about that my bad.
> Anyway, since we are close to Squee
On Mon, 2011-01-17 at 12:50 +0100, Guillaume Mazoyer wrote:
> > OK. Thanks for the explanation. Could you write this patch ?
> Sure.
>
> The only thing I'm concerned about is that if I wrote the patch then the
> package will build in *experimental* but it will not in *unstable*. The
> API break th
> OK. Thanks for the explanation. Could you write this patch ?
Sure.
The only thing I'm concerned about is that if I wrote the patch then the
package will build in *experimental* but it will not in *unstable*. The
API break that libnotify brings was introduced in the 0.7.0 version.
So here is 2 q
Mark your calendars! Free Java @ Fosdem will be in less than 3 weeks.
Saturday 5, Sunday 6 February 2011, Fosdem, Brussels, Belgium. Room AW1.125.
We got a very good selection of very diverse talks, all around core java
implementation issues, integration, community and the future of Free
Java as
On Sun, 2011-01-16 at 19:53 +0100, Guillaume Mazoyer wrote:
> >
> > GCC generated/bindings/org/gnome/notify/NotifyNotification.c
> > generated/bindings/org/gnome/notify/NotifyNotification.c: In function
> > 'Java_org_gnome_notify_NotifyNotification_notify_1notification_1new':
> > generated/binding
6 matches
Mail list logo
