RFS: gant (new upstream release)

Hi team, I'm looking for a sponsor for this new release of gant. I need this updated release in order to package Gradle. Here is the latest changelog entry: gant (1.9.3-1) experimental; urgency=low * New upstream release. * Add myself to Uploaders. * Bump Standards-Version to 3.9.1. No cha

RFS: codenarc (new package, needed to package Gradle)

Hi team, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "codenarc". * Package name: codenarc Version : 0.9-1 Upstream Author : Chris Mair * URL : http://codenarc.sourceforge.net/ * License : Apache-2.0 Section : java It builds these binary packages: libco

RFS: gmetrics (new package, needed to package CodeNarc)

Hi team, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "gmetrics". * Package name: gmetrics Version : 0.3-1 Upstream Author : Chris Mair * URL : http://gmetrics.sourceforge.net/ * License : Apache-2.0 Section : java It builds these binary packages: libgm

Clojure versioning

Hi, I am in the process of packaging Clojure 1.2 for Debian. While doing so, I noticed that Clojure 1.1 AOT compiled packages, such as clojure-contrib, won't work with 1.2. This led me to discover that AOT compiled packages are in general not guaranteed to work between Clojure versions. The way

Re: RFS: service-wrapper-java [2nd try]

Hello Remi, I have uploaded the package to experimental archive instead of unstable, just for the duration of the freeze. Please feel free to contact me directly for future uploads of this package, and thank you for your contribution to Debian. Cheers, tony On 08/19/2010 04:46 AM, Rémi Debay wr

Bug#593627: java-common: please use openjdk as default jdk on powerpcspe

On Sat, Aug 21, 2010 at 04:13:34PM +0200, Niels Thykier wrote: > Personally I am okay with doing it and it is the intention of the Java > Team to make openjdk the default on all architectures. The question is > if we should do it now or after Squeeze (CC'ed the release team) for > their comments. >

Re: Java webapps and configuration files

On 08/21/2010 07:23 AM, Tom Marble wrote: > On 08/21/2010 12:19 AM, Torsten Werner wrote: >> BTW I do not like your 3rd option at all. It sounds unsupportable in >> the long run and the local admin has to learn a new tool which is only >> used in Debian and only for Tomcat based apps. We should eit

Re: Java webapps and configuration files

On 08/21/2010 12:19 AM, Torsten Werner wrote: > BTW I do not like your 3rd option at all. It sounds unsupportable in > the long run and the local admin has to learn a new tool which is only > used in Debian and only for Tomcat based apps. We should either use > some existing solution or something g

Bug#593627: java-common: please use openjdk as default jdk on powerpcspe

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On 2010-08-19 19:40, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote: > Package: java-common > Version: 0.39 > Severity: wishlist > Tags: patch sid > User: debian-powerpc...@breakpoint.cc > Usertags: powerpcspe > > openjdk is built and seems to work :) > > Sebasti

Re: Java webapps and configuration files

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On 2010-08-21 14:43, Faidon Liambotis wrote: > Torsten Werner wrote: >> 1) Good webapps support theming. The local admin can put override >> files into some different directory. > FWIW, jspwiki has a template mechanism. The package (already in the >

Re: Java webapps and configuration files

Torsten Werner wrote: > 1) Good webapps support theming. The local admin can put override > files into some different directory. FWIW, jspwiki has a template mechanism. The package (already in the archive) requires the admin to put his own templates under /usr/share/jspwiki/templates (i.e.