Re: GlassFish v3

2010-08-09 Thread Torsten Werner
On Mon, Aug 9, 2010 at 11:28 PM, Ludovic Claude wrote: > Glassfish 3 is a huge beast. I'd like to have it packaged, but it will take > some time. I should tackle Apache Felix which is required by Glassfish, but > this month and the next will be quite busy for me. Which components of Felix (http:/

Re: GlassFish v3

2010-08-09 Thread Ludovic Claude
Hello Tim, Glassfish 3 is a huge beast. I'd like to have it packaged, but it will take some time. I should tackle Apache Felix which is required by Glassfish, but this month and the next will be quite busy for me. Ludovic Le 28/07/2010 11:01, Tim Stoop a écrit : Hi all, New to this list,

java-common_0.39_amd64.changes ACCEPTED

2010-08-09 Thread Archive Administrator
Accepted: default-jdk-doc_0.39_all.deb to main/j/java-common/default-jdk-doc_0.39_all.deb default-jdk_1.6-39_amd64.deb to main/j/java-common/default-jdk_1.6-39_amd64.deb default-jre-headless_1.6-39_amd64.deb to main/j/java-common/default-jre-headless_1.6-39_amd64.deb default-jre_1.6-39_amd

RFS: NMU: swt-gtk 3.5.1-2.1

2010-08-09 Thread أحمد المحمودي
Please sponsor the NMU for swt-gtk The upload would fix these bugs: 587643, 577360 577360 is a FTBFS The latest entry in Debian changelog is: swt-gtk (3.5.1-2.1) unstable; urgency=low * NMU * debian/control: + Replace default-jdk-builddep with default-jdk, gcj-native-helper in B-D

Processing of java-common_0.39_amd64.changes

2010-08-09 Thread Archive Administrator
java-common_0.39_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: java-common_0.39.dsc java-common_0.39.tar.gz java-common_0.39_all.deb default-jdk-doc_0.39_all.deb default-jre_1.6-39_amd64.deb default-jre-headless_1.6-39_amd64.deb default-jdk_1.6-39_amd64.deb

Re : Re: RFS: service-wrapper-ja va

2010-08-09 Thread remi DEBAY
I am packaging another software which needs the jar as a build dependency. --Message d'origine-- De :Matthew Johnson À :remi DEBAY Cc :debian-java@lists.debian.org Cc :Roberto Espinoza Objet : Re: RFS: service-wrapper-java Envoyé :9 aoû, 2010 18:14 On Mon Aug 09 18:08, Rémi Debay wrote:

Re: RFS: service-wrapper-java

2010-08-09 Thread Matthew Johnson
On Mon Aug 09 18:08, Rémi Debay wrote: > Hi Matthew, > > Thanks for your advice. > > it's a daemon launcher for a jar file so i may say it is a program. I have 3 > files : a binary launcher, a jar libary and a jni library. > What about naming three packages ? > - libservice-wrapper-java (library

Re: RFS: service-wrapper-java

2010-08-09 Thread Rémi Debay
Hi Matthew, Thanks for your advice. it's a daemon launcher for a jar file so i may say it is a program. I have 3 files : a binary launcher, a jar libary and a jni library. What about naming three packages ? - libservice-wrapper-java (library) arch all - libservice-wrapper-jni (jni library) arch

Re: RFS: service-wrapper-java

2010-08-09 Thread Matthew Johnson
On Mon Aug 09 17:28, Rémi Debay wrote: > First, Many thanks for the review. I am working on the issues. > I already moved the library to the new standards but i need to use a > different make file for each arch to build the jni lib(this is the way it is > done in upstream source). Is it allowed by

Re: RFS: service-wrapper-java

2010-08-09 Thread Rémi Debay
Hi Tony, First, Many thanks for the review. I am working on the issues. I already moved the library to the new standards but i need to use a different make file for each arch to build the jni lib(this is the way it is done in upstream source). Is it allowed by standards ? The package you checked w