Re: New section for 'Building Java Packages' (relating to [RFC: update to our website (on Alioth)])

2010-07-16 Thread Alexander Holupirek
On 16.07.2010, at 01:30, Matthew Johnson wrote: > On Thu Jul 15 12:14, Alexander Holupirek wrote: >> To make a long story short. A list on the available helpers, their current >> status and a link on how they should be used (or not) would be a great help >> for novices. >> > I am working on this,

Re: Uploading fop 1.0 to experimental

2010-07-16 Thread Eric Lavarde
On 16/07/10 14:39, Vincent Fourmond wrote: I would suggest uploading to experimental and to give some time to people to check the persistance (or not) of existing bugs, and then send the whole thing to unstable, in a couple of weeks. I would suggest pinging people using fop as a build depends;

Re: RFC : update to our website (on Alioth)

2010-07-16 Thread Damien Raude-Morvan
Le jeudi 15 juillet 2010 10:25:38, Niels Thykier a écrit : > On 2010-07-14 18:52, Damien Raude-Morvan wrote: > > 01_debian_java_mailinglist.diff : Recommend usage of debian-java mailing > > list when looking for support under pkg-java umbrella. > > > > 02_git_repository.diff: Add a link to our GIT

Re: Uploading fop 1.0 to experimental

2010-07-16 Thread Vincent Fourmond
On Fri, Jul 16, 2010 at 11:59 AM, wrote: >  I have prepared the debian package for fop 1.0. I would like to upload it > to experimental so that people can start playing with it. Does this seems > resonable, or should I just go ahead and upload to unstable ? I would suggest uploading to experim

Uploading fop 1.0 to experimental

2010-07-16 Thread mathieu . malaterre
Hi there, I have prepared the debian package for fop 1.0. I would like to upload it to experimental so that people can start playing with it. Does this seems resonable, or should I just go ahead and upload to unstable ? Thanks for comments, -- Mathieu signature.asc Description: OpenPGP dig