java-common_0.38_i386.changes ACCEPTED

Accepted: default-jdk-doc_0.38_all.deb to main/j/java-common/default-jdk-doc_0.38_all.deb default-jdk_1.6-38_i386.deb to main/j/java-common/default-jdk_1.6-38_i386.deb default-jre-headless_1.6-38_i386.deb to main/j/java-common/default-jre-headless_1.6-38_i386.deb default-jre_1.6-38_i386.de

Processing of java-common_0.38_i386.changes

java-common_0.38_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: java-common_0.38.dsc java-common_0.38.tar.gz java-common_0.38_all.deb default-jdk-doc_0.38_all.deb default-jre_1.6-38_i386.deb default-jre-headless_1.6-38_i386.deb default-jdk_1.6-38_i386.deb gcj-

Re: RFS: castor (new package, needed to package Spring Framework 3.0)

Hi Torsten, On Wed, Jun 30, 2010 at 4:56 PM, Torsten Werner wrote: > Hi Miguel, > > there are 2 PDF files in src/doc created from Word without the source format. Yes, silly me for not noticing those files. Already fixed in the git repo. Cheers, -- Miguel Landaeta, miguel at miguel.cc secure e

Re: RFS: libjsr166y-java (new package, needed to package GPars)

Hi Miguel, On Tue, Jun 29, 2010 at 3:44 AM, Miguel Landaeta wrote: > I am looking for a sponsor for my package "libjsr166y-java". uploaded. Cheers, Torsten -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-java-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debi

Re: RFS: geronimo-commonj-spec (new package, needed to package Spring Framework 3.0)

Hi Miguel, On Tue, Jun 29, 2010 at 3:24 AM, Miguel Landaeta wrote: > I am looking for a sponsor for my package "geronimo-commonj-spec". uploaded. Cheers, Torsten -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-java-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@list

Re: RFS: castor (new package, needed to package Spring Framework 3.0)

Hi Miguel, On Tue, Jun 29, 2010 at 1:23 AM, Miguel Landaeta wrote: > I am looking for a sponsor for my package "castor". there are 2 PDF files in src/doc created from Word without the source format. Cheers, Torsten -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-java-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subje

Re: jconsole

No (very little). The JMX access is very optimized and consumes very little resource. Is negligible in most cases. This is not the JConsole causing overhead but rather the amount of data that you Monitor. JConsole is the old, rather uses Vis