Hi,
I am working on migrating (build)rdeps of libservlet2.4-java. While
working on libproxool-java I observed that the packaging bits include
a separate debian/build.xml file even though upstream ships one. There
is no mention in debian/changelog as to why this file was created or
why wasn't it re
Great.
Juste a question: what about others scm:
CVS, hg, git etc...
thanks for this great piece of software.
Frédéric
Message d'origine
De: Ludovic Claude [mailto:ludovic.cla...@laposte.net]
Date: mer. 23/06/2010 00:04
À: Debian Java Maintainers
Objet : News on the Maven fron
This is great. One question I have is however what happens if a dependency
is not packaged in debian as the flow shows but is required at runtime.
Will it be included in the package or will it be ignored and therefore a
potentially non functioning package produced.
Another question... can we have
Hello,
Since Torsten has sponsored the new versions of maven-repo-helper (1.1)
and maven-debian-helper (1.0), I would like to show you how to package
software built with Maven in Debian.
It's actually quite easy, since Maven gives lots of information about a
project, in particular its list
On Wed, Jun 23, 2010 at 01:11:04AM +0530, Onkar Shinde wrote:
> Hi,
>
> tuxguitar is in DEPWAIT state on powerpc for more than 5 months for
> some unknown reason. The build dependency has been fixed for long time
> and the package has build successfully on all architectures except
> hurd-i386. It
On Tue, Jun 22, 2010 at 11:00 PM, Scott Howard wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 21, 2010 at 2:10 PM, Niels Thykier wrote:
>> * Removed dependencies on JREs - per the Java Policy this is no
>> longer required.
>
> Do we not need to depend on default-jre-headless for libraries? Or is
> it optional? I don't
On Wed, Jun 23, 2010 at 12:42 AM, Vincent Fourmond wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 22, 2010 at 6:30 PM, Onkar Shinde wrote:
>> Any sponsorer for this?
>
> Yes, me ;-)...
>
> It's on its way, please tag accordingly.
Done.
Onkar
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-java-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a su
Hi Niels,
This is for my own education, but could you explain the following for me:
On Mon, Jun 21, 2010 at 2:10 PM, Niels Thykier wrote:
> * Removed dependencies on JREs - per the Java Policy this is no
> longer required.
Do we not need to depend on default-jre-headless for libraries? Or i
Hi Niels,
On Mon, Jun 21, 2010 at 8:10 PM, Niels Thykier wrote:
> I have prepared a new upstream release of icu4j; since eclipse 3.5 needs
> 4.0.1.1, I have renamed the package to icu4j-4.2 to avoid clashes with the
> old package.
may you add a get-orig-source target, please?
Cheers,
Torsten
Hi,
tuxguitar is in DEPWAIT state on powerpc for more than 5 months for
some unknown reason. The build dependency has been fixed for long time
and the package has build successfully on all architectures except
hurd-i386. It will be great if build on powerpc can be retried.
gb tuxguitar . powerp
On Tue, Jun 22, 2010 at 6:30 PM, Onkar Shinde wrote:
> Any sponsorer for this?
Yes, me ;-)...
It's on its way, please tag accordingly.
Cheers,
Vincent
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-java-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@li
On Tue, Jun 22, 2010 at 10:28:32PM +0530, Onkar Shinde wrote:
> Hello,
>
> libitext-java failed to build on mips and sparc due to now fixed bug
> 580148. So the builds should succeed now.
>
> gb libitext-java . mips sparc
Done.
Kurt
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-java-requ...@lists.de
Hello,
libitext-java failed to build on mips and sparc due to now fixed bug
580148. So the builds should succeed now.
gb libitext-java . mips sparc
Thanks,
Onkar
--
Passion - Some people climb mountains - others write Free software.
Don't ask why - the reason is the same.
--
To UNSUBSCRIB
Any sponsorer for this?
Onkar
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-java-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive:
http://lists.debian.org/aanlktilwaizo81ov4vpzzb3htwnmfv7yrjsjb5ux3...@mail.gmail.com
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 5.1.4-6 (old version is
5.1.5)
of my package "acgvision-agent".
It builds these binary packages:
acgvision-agent - Monitoring client for ACGVision.
The package appears to be lintian clean.
The upload would fix these bugs: 584937, 5858
Hi Miguel,
On Mon, Jun 21, 2010 at 12:53 AM, Miguel Landaeta wrote:
> Ok. Fixed. I removed that file from the tarball.
uploaded.
Cheers,
Torsten
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-java-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Arch
16 matches
Mail list logo
