Samuel Lucas Vaz de Mello wrote:
>>> It seems we don't need default-jdk-doc nor libjna-java-doc.
>> ---end quoted text---
>>
>> I remember reading on that list to link the API documentation against
>> default-jdk-doc & API documentation of other java libs that the package
>> depends on.
>>
>> Also,
>> It seems we don't need default-jdk-doc nor libjna-java-doc.
> ---end quoted text---
>
> I remember reading on that list to link the API documentation against
> default-jdk-doc & API documentation of other java libs that the package
> depends on.
>
> Also, it was mentioned that those doc packages
On Sat, May 22, 2010 at 01:51:51PM +0300, أحمد المحمودي wrote:
> On Fri, May 21, 2010 at 12:19:42AM -0300, Samuel Lucas Vaz de Mello wrote:
> > It seems we don't need default-jdk-doc nor libjna-java-doc.
> ---end quoted text---
>
> I remember reading on that list to link the API documentation agai
On Fri, May 21, 2010 at 12:19:42AM -0300, Samuel Lucas Vaz de Mello wrote:
> It seems we don't need default-jdk-doc nor libjna-java-doc.
---end quoted text---
I remember reading on that list to link the API documentation against
default-jdk-doc & API documentation of other java libs that the pack
Il 22/05/2010 12:41, Torsten Werner ha scritto:
> On Sat, May 22, 2010 at 12:27 PM, Steffen Möller
> wrote:
>> I am not aware of any reverse-dependency. It can go.
>
> let's file a removal request against 0.7 after 0.8 gets accepted.
Totally agree.
Giovanni.
--
Giovanni Mascellani
Pisa, Ital
Hi,
On Sat, May 22, 2010 at 12:27 PM, Steffen Möller wrote:
> I am not aware of any reverse-dependency. It can go.
let's file a removal request against 0.7 after 0.8 gets accepted.
> Just ensure that there is a versioned jar and if there
> is an unversioned binary package name, then this should
Hello,
On 05/22/2010 12:00 PM, Torsten Werner wrote:
> On Sat, May 22, 2010 at 1:09 AM, Giovanni Mascellani
> wrote:
>> I made a big mistake with libjgrapht0.8-java:
>
> no the mistake was originally made by Steffen who uploaded version 0.7
> to experimental without changing the source name.
T
Hi Giovanni,
On Sat, May 22, 2010 at 1:09 AM, Giovanni Mascellani
wrote:
> I made a big mistake with libjgrapht0.8-java:
no the mistake was originally made by Steffen who uploaded version 0.7
to experimental without changing the source name.
@Steffen: What are your plans with version 0.7? Uplo
Il 22/05/2010 08:27, Egon Willighagen ha scritto:
> On Sat, May 22, 2010 at 1:09 AM, Giovanni Mascellani
> wrote:
>> I made a big mistake with libjgrapht0.8-java: I forgot to rename the
>> source package from libjgrapht-java to libjgrapht0.8-java. Fortunately
>> the package got in NEW, so I just w
9 matches
Mail list logo
