Re: future of libjibx*-java

2010-05-08 Thread Eric Lavarde
On 09/05/10 03:03, Torsten Werner wrote: Hi Eric, On Sat, May 8, 2010 at 10:11 PM, Eric Lavarde wrote: Once JiBx1.2 is available in Ubuntu, I'll abandon my blockade. but may we remove version 1.0 from the archive at least? Yes, please, do. Thanks, Eric -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-

Re: future of libjibx*-java

2010-05-08 Thread Torsten Werner
Hi Eric, On Sat, May 8, 2010 at 10:11 PM, Eric Lavarde wrote: > Once JiBx1.2 is available in Ubuntu, I'll abandon my blockade. but may we remove version 1.0 from the archive at least? Torsten -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-java-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Tr

Re: future of libjibx*-java

2010-05-08 Thread Eric Lavarde
Hello, ergh, sorry but I rolled-back this change as I packaged the next version of FreeMind (0.9.0~rc7, uploaded 2 seconds ago on mentors). Reason: I want the FreeMind package to keep working under Debian and Ubuntu without having to keep 2 sets of patches (or even having to rebuild the pack

Re: implementing sensible-java to improve the alternative system

2010-05-08 Thread Torsten Werner
On Sat, May 8, 2010 at 6:20 PM, Matthias Klose wrote: > then sensible-* seems a waste of resources. maybe you could come up with a > rationale first, what you do want to achieve? Have you read the wiki page? "All java related tools such as java, javac, javadoc are symlinks are handled by the alt

Re: implementing sensible-java to improve the alternative system

2010-05-08 Thread Matthias Klose
On 06.05.2010 16:00, Torsten Werner wrote: Hi Matthias, improving the current alternative-based system is needed, but you only replace one inflexible system with another one. That is intended somehow. Java-common should not be updated too often and that is why the flavor mapping is based on d

future of libjibx*-java

2010-05-08 Thread Torsten Werner
Hi, I have updated freemind in our svn repo to work with libjibx1.2-java instead of libjibx1.1-java. I suggest to upload freemind 0.9.0~rc6+dfsg-4 with that change and to file removal requests against libjibx-java (1.0) and libjibx1.1-java. Are there any reasons to keep the old versions of jibx th

Re: possible error in /etc/java-6-sun/fontconfig.properties

2010-05-08 Thread Alberto Alvarez García
On 05/08/2010 11:34 AM, Torsten Werner wrote: >> There is a space between "arphic/" and "uming.ttc". >> >> Shouldn't it be removed? > > Good catch! Thanks for reporting. I have fixed the file in the SVN repo. > > Cheers, > Torsten > We should also thank the creator of "etckeeper" that keeps tra

Re: possible error in /etc/java-6-sun/fontconfig.properties

2010-05-08 Thread Torsten Werner
Cc-ing debian-java 2010/5/8 Alberto Alvarez García : > /etc/java-6-sun/fontconfig.properties > > It contains the following line: > > filename.-arphic-ar_pl_shanheisun_uni-medium-r-normal--*-*-*-*-p-*-iso10646-1=/usr/share/fonts/truetype/arphic/ > uming.ttc > > There is a space between "arphic/" a