Hi
As some of you know, default-jdk-builddep (usually) pulls in two JDKs
(openjdk-6 and gcj/gij) to create -gcj packages.
However, some people are not aware of this and looking at the name of
the package they assume it is the Java Team's "Default Build-Dependency"
or in other words the "Right Th
Michael Tautschnig wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> the source package java-gcj-compat just got removed from unstable. That
>> breaks quite a number of other packages but the fix should be trivial in
>> most cases: change the Build-Depends to default-jdk. Please DON'T use
>> default-jdk-builddep except you know
> Hi,
>
> the source package java-gcj-compat just got removed from unstable. That
> breaks quite a number of other packages but the fix should be trivial in
> most cases: change the Build-Depends to default-jdk. Please DON'T use
> default-jdk-builddep except you know what you are doing.
>
Would
Source: java-common
Version: 0.35
Severity: important
Tags: patch
User: debian-...@superh.org
Usertags: sh4
X-Debbugs-CC: debian-sup...@lists.debian.org
Hi,
I am now trying to run Debian on Renesas SH(sh4) CPU.
http://buildd.debian-ports.org/status/architecture.php?suite=unstable&a=sh4
sh4 suppo
Hi,
First of all: thanks Matthew and Niels for the rapid and
informative responses. [And thanks for cc'ing me, as I
don't subscribe to debian-java]
On Mon, Apr 05, 2010 at 12:29:45AM +0100, Matthew Johnson wrote:
> On Sun Apr 04 17:49, Steve M. Robbins wrote:
> > I've been prodded to package th
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 348398 + wontfix
Bug #348398 [java-common] java-common: should suggest using java-package
instead of equivs
Added tag(s) wontfix.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system admin
tags 348398 + wontfix
thanks
Hi
We have filed an RM on java-package and therefore this will not be fixed
(see #577423 for more information). I will close this bug when
java-package has been removed.
~Niels
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Your message dated Sun, 11 Apr 2010 16:21:15 +0200
with message-id <4bc1dadb.2090...@thykier.net>
and subject line java-common: JAVA POLICY: define default
JAVA_HOME=/usr/lib/java as alternative.
has caused the Debian Bug report #283557,
regarding java-common: JAVA POLICY: define default JAVA_HOME
Package: ftp.debian.org
Severity: normal
Hi,
it's time to say good bye! Java-package is obsolete since the
introduction of the DJL licensed sun-java5 and it has not been touched
since the release of Lenny. We will release Squeeze with openjdk-6,
gcj-jdk, and the non-free sun-java6.
Cheers,
Torst
Hi,
I will remove the following wiki pages next week if nobody objects.
They have been unmaintained for several years now.
http://wiki.debian.org/ApplicationClasspath
http://wiki.debian.org/ClasspathDependencies
http://wiki.debian.org/Classpath_unit_description
http://wiki.debian.org/CombinedClas
Your message dated Sun, 11 Apr 2010 14:01:03 +0200
with message-id <4bc1b9ff.1000...@thykier.net>
and subject line Re: [Java Policy] no dependencies on real java versions
has caused the Debian Bug report #228532,
regarding [JAVA POLICY] No upgrade when sablevm is alternatvie for /usr/bin/java
to be
Your message dated Sun, 11 Apr 2010 14:01:03 +0200
with message-id <4bc1b9ff.1000...@thykier.net>
and subject line Re: [Java Policy] no dependencies on real java versions
has caused the Debian Bug report #228532,
regarding [JAVA POLICY] can't find working java on install when JAVA_HOME not
set
to
Your message dated Sun, 11 Apr 2010 13:40:44 +0200
with message-id <4bc1b53c.3040...@thykier.net>
and subject line Re: Bug#562954: java-common: All java networking ignores ipv4
interfaces
has caused the Debian Bug report #562954,
regarding java-common: All java networking ignores ipv4 interfaces
t
Your message dated Sun, 11 Apr 2010 13:36:03 +0200
with message-id <4bc1b423.9040...@thykier.net>
and subject line Re: java-common: update-java-alternatives "cannot find
alternative, `/usr/lib/gcj-4.1/libgcjwebplugin.so' "
has caused the Debian Bug report #409901,
regarding java-common: update-jav
Your message dated Sun, 11 Apr 2010 13:29:18 +0200
with message-id <4bc1b28e.5050...@thykier.net>
and subject line Re: java-common: update-java-alternatives fail to set
alternatives for jdk
has caused the Debian Bug report #41,
regarding java-common: update-java-alternatives fail to set altern
Hi,
the source package java-gcj-compat just got removed from unstable. That
breaks quite a number of other packages but the fix should be trivial in
most cases: change the Build-Depends to default-jdk. Please DON'T use
default-jdk-builddep except you know what you are doing.
Cheers,
Torsten
si
Hi Onkar,
On Sun, 11 Apr, 2010 at 12:15:14PM +0530, Onkar Shinde wrote:
> Hi Varun,
>
> I just checked that you uploaded a new revision of oscache. You have
> added build properties for setting target JVM version 1.4. But the
> variable you used is wrong (contrary to what the variable name
> sugg
17 matches
Mail list logo
