Re: Bug#574910: ITP: libbccrypto-java -- Java cryptography APIs

On Mon, Mar 22, 2010 at 6:34 PM, Damien Raude-Morvan wrote: > You should have a look at already existing "bouncycastle" source package > [1] which provide those binary packages : > libbcmail-java - Bouncy Castle generators/processors for S/MIME and CMS > libbcpg-java - Bouncy Castle generators/pro

Re: Bug#574910: ITP: libbccrypto-java -- Java cryptography APIs

Hello, Damien Raude-Morvan wrote: > On Sun, 21 Mar 2010 21:07:37 -0430, Miguel Landaeta > wrote: >> * Package name: libbccrypto-java >> Version : 1.45 > > You should have a look at already existing "bouncycastle" source package > [1] which provide those binary packages : > libbc

Re: Bug#574910: ITP: libbccrypto-java -- Java cryptography APIs

Hi Miguel, On Sun, 21 Mar 2010 21:07:37 -0430, Miguel Landaeta wrote: > * Package name: libbccrypto-java > Version : 1.45 You should have a look at already existing "bouncycastle" source package [1] which provide those binary packages : libbcmail-java - Bouncy Castle generators/pro

Processed: Re: Bug#354026: java-package: generated package should provide java1-runtime

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tags 354026 + wontfix Bug #354026 [java-common] Debian Java Policy needs to be updated regarding java*-runtime usage Added tag(s) wontfix. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system a

Bug#354026: java-package: generated package should provide java1-runtime

tags 354026 + wontfix thanks Hi Thanks for the proposal, but I believe that the underlying premise that "java-runtime" should be the only should be used no longer matches the current de-facto standard of the Java Team. If you still feel this policy proposal is valid, please right back and I wil

Processed: Re: Processed (with 6 errors): Re: policy proposal: java2 alternative

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tags 158984 + wontfix Bug #158984 [java-common] policy proposal: java2 alternative Added tag(s) wontfix. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian

Bug#158984: policy proposal: java2 alternative

Hi I am tagging this as wontfix, because I believe that a separate java in path is no longer required with the current JVMs in Debian. Thanks for the proposal nevertheless and feel free to write back if you feel this proposal is still relevant. ~Niels signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digita

Re: RFS: jython 2.2.1-2.1

On Sun, Mar 21, 2010 at 09:39:51AM -0700, tony mancill wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > Yes, and it's definitely my mistake for sponsoring without checking the bug. > I > cc:ed Nicolas on the upload and here again. Nicolas, my apologies for the > over-zealous upload.