-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
أحمد المحمودي wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 28, 2010 at 11:43:22PM -0500, Varun Hiremath wrote:
>> Ahmed, thanks for fixing the package. But, I think library packages
>> should at least depend on the -jre-headless package. AFAIK, that has
>> been the general pr
On Sun, Feb 28, 2010 at 11:43:22PM -0500, Varun Hiremath wrote:
> Ahmed, thanks for fixing the package. But, I think library packages
> should at least depend on the -jre-headless package. AFAIK, that has
> been the general practice with other library packages in Debian.
---end quoted text---
I've
On Sun, 28 Feb, 2010 at 08:30:56PM -0800, tony mancill wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Uploaded. Note that and the release field in debian/changelog was
> UNRELEASED;
> I changed it to unstable. I don't have commit permissions to SVN repo, so
> please commit this
On Sun, Feb 28, 2010 at 08:30:56PM -0800, tony mancill wrote:
> Uploaded. Note that and the release field in debian/changelog was
> UNRELEASED;
> I changed it to unstable. I don't have commit permissions to SVN repo, so
> please commit this change (attached) manually.
---end quoted text---
Don
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Uploaded. Note that and the release field in debian/changelog was UNRELEASED;
I changed it to unstable. I don't have commit permissions to SVN repo, so
please commit this change (attached) manually.
Thank you,
Tony
أحمد المحمودي wrote:
> On Sun,
On Sun, Feb 28, 2010 at 08:47:23PM +0200, أحمد المحمودي wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 28, 2010 at 01:06:16PM -0500, Varun Hiremath wrote:
> > I did that with some other minor changes, and have uploaded the package.
> ---end quoted text---
>
> Thanks a lot. Yet, I think that lib*-java aren't supposed to Dep
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 02/21/2010 04:40 AM, Gabriele Giacone wrote:
> but I found out it currently doesn't build on chroot due to some
> dependency problems. I'll come back when I solve.
Ok, now thanks to Ludovic and its maven-debian-helper 0.8, it builds fine.
http://me
On Wed, Feb 24, 2010 at 6:07 PM, Torsten Werner
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Tue, Feb 23, 2010 at 3:32 AM, Tiago Saboga wrote:
>> This package currently depends on netbeans-ide, which means it will
>> potentially push more than 200Mb into users disk.
>
> erm. Netbeans is in contrib but omegat in main. How
On Wed, Feb 24, 2010 at 6:01 PM, Torsten Werner
wrote:
> Hi Tiago,
>
> On Tue, Feb 23, 2010 at 3:13 AM, Tiago Saboga wrote:
>> I have uploaded a new version with JAVA_HOME corrected, at the same place.
>
> please commit your change to the svn repo.
Done.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-jav
On Sun, Feb 28, 2010 at 01:06:16PM -0500, Varun Hiremath wrote:
> I did that with some other minor changes, and have uploaded the package.
---end quoted text---
Thanks a lot. Yet, I think that lib*-java aren't supposed to Depend on
a jre anyways, so default-jre | ... could be removed from Depends
Hi,
On Sun, 28 Feb, 2010 at 06:43:13PM +0100, Torsten Werner wrote:
> Hi Ahmed,
>
> On Sat, Feb 27, 2010 at 4:18 PM,
> wrote:
> > ?? I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 3.0-4 of
> > ?? libbasicplayer-java.
>
> shouldn't we switch to default-jdk for this pac
Hi Ahmed,
On Sat, Feb 27, 2010 at 4:18 PM, أحمد المحمودي wrote:
> I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 3.0-4 of
> libbasicplayer-java.
shouldn't we switch to default-jdk for this package? Can you try that,
please? Otherwise it looks good.
Cheers,
Torsten
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email
On Sun, Feb 28, 2010 at 5:27 PM, Eric Lavarde wrote:
> If that means being able to install both versions side by side, and being
> able to redirect usage of ant using ANT_HOME (cdbs), then fine with me.
No, currently it is just a quick workaround for the dirty bug in gij.
That means you can eithe
Hi,
instead of discussing ant versions I want to draw your attention to
#560044, #560056 and similar bug reports. I think that is a much worse
problem and we need a solution.
Cheers,
Torsten
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-java-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Troub
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "sweethome3d".
* Package name: sweethome3d
Version : 2.2+dfsg-1
Upstream Author : Emmanuel Puybaret, eTeks
* URL : http://www.sweethome3d.eu/
* License : GPL-3+
Section : java
It builds these
Torsten Werner wrote:
On Sun, Feb 28, 2010 at 1:06 PM, Torsten Werner wrote:
We should think about having 2 versions of ant in Debian.
I mean: having 2 upstream major versions of ant by default and not
just as a quick fix as we have it now. But the unversioned ant should
always point to the l
On Sun, Feb 28, 2010 at 1:06 PM, Torsten Werner wrote:
> We should think about having 2 versions of ant in Debian.
I mean: having 2 upstream major versions of ant by default and not
just as a quick fix as we have it now. But the unversioned ant should
always point to the latest stable release. Wh
On Sun, Feb 28, 2010 at 12:38 PM, Eric Lavarde wrote:
> Well, just after ant 1.8 has been uploaded, we've got at least 10 FTBFS
> bugs.
But only some of them can be attributed to ant. Maven-invoker-plugin
uses maven (not ant) for building! Some FTBFS are caused by asm3 and
groovy uploads.
> I'm
Hello again,
sorry to reply to myself, but I wanted to install ant1.7 and found out
that it can't be installed in parallel with ant (1.8); as we might end
up with a situation where certain packages will build correctly with Ant
1.7 and others with 1.8, I'm not sure this is viable.
Any idea (
Hi Torsten,
Torsten Werner wrote:
On Sat, Feb 27, 2010 at 9:33 PM, Eric Lavarde wrote:
I'm not a big Java specialist, just a packager, but we've seen quite a lot
of FTBFS bugs due to the upload of ant 1.8. I'm personally hit by one for
FreeMind, so I would support Matthias' suggestion until so
20 matches
Mail list logo
