Re: RFS: jetty5 (eclipse dependency)

Torsten Werner wrote: > Hi, > > how did you create the upstream tarball? I've created it manually and > uploaded the package. > > Cheers, > Torsten > > Hi Thanks for the uploads; I created the tarball manually as well. ~Niels signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: RFS: jasper (eclipse dependency)

On Sat, Feb 6, 2010 at 4:55 PM, Niels Thykier wrote: > I am (partly) reviving jasper (a part of the tomcat5.5 package) for the > sake of keeping eclipse in main. I have reduced the tar.gz and removed > (to eclipse) all irrelevant binary-packages/jars. uploaded Cheers, Torsten -- To UNSUBSCRIB

Re: RFS: jetty5 (eclipse dependency)

Hi, how did you create the upstream tarball? I've created it manually and uploaded the package. Cheers, Torsten -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-java-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Fwd: Re: Tomcat packaging improvements

Jason, I will fix point 2. About 1., I have seen those classloaders directories being used by some applications, in particular Alfresco from Ubuntu partner repository, so changing this may break existing stuff. About 3. I will have a look, but I'm not sure if I can make it work and test it properly

[Fwd: Re: Tomcat packaging improvements]

Jason, I will fix point 2. About 1., I have seen those classloaders directories being used by some applications, in particular Alfresco from Ubuntu partner repository, so changing this may break existing stuff. About 3. I will have a look, but I'm not sure if I can make it work and test it properly

Re: Considering RM of jamvm and cacao

Hi, On 12/02/2010 20:29, Niels Thykier wrote: Vincent Fourmond wrote: [...] +1. We basically only need openjdk and gcj (and the cacao variant of openjdk, which is performing much better on some platforms, it seems). Just for clarification, by "the cacao variant of openjdk" did you mean "ic

Re: RFS: asm3 (eclipse dependency)

On Wed, Feb 10, 2010 at 10:33 PM, Niels Thykier wrote: > I have prepared a new version of asm3 for the sake of eclipse. I had to > install the "asm-all" jar - since eclipse insist that this particular > library must be provided by one jar only. In order to keep the size down > and keep backwards c

Re: packages with maven support

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Torsten Werner wrote: > uploaded. ...and also thanks here :) Cheers, Gabriele -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAkt1uX0ACgkQp3cdCbVcnCvnLACg4d4EE8xjqi4RT+EGZ/BzP6Fa jMkAoNN0D7FUN6Jy1WJIxAY1tLew7M9G =7T0c -

Re: packages with maven support

On Wed, Feb 10, 2010 at 11:28 PM, Gabriele Giacone <1o5g4...@gmail.com> wrote: > gnu-getopt > http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/l/libgetopt-java/libgetopt-java_1.0.13-2.dsc ... > Could any DD review/upload them? > Please, don't do it you all at the same time :p uploaded. Cheers, Torste

Re: RFS: libcommons-el-java (Regression fix)

Hi Niels, Niels Thykier schrieb: > I am looking for a sponsor to upload libcommons-el-java, which will fix > a regression (#559323), which was introduced by being built by a java6 > compiler without having set target version. uploaded. Cheers, Torsten -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-java-r

Re: Considering RM of jamvm and cacao

Vincent Fourmond wrote: > [...] > +1. We basically only need openjdk and gcj (and the cacao variant of > openjdk, which is performing much better on some platforms, it seems). > > Hi Just for clarification, by "the cacao variant of openjdk" did you mean "icedtea-6-jre-cacao", which is a part

RFS: libcommons-el-java (Regression fix)

Hi I am looking for a sponsor to upload libcommons-el-java, which will fix a regression (#559323), which was introduced by being built by a java6 compiler without having set target version. Here is the latest changelog entry: libcommons-el-java (1.0-6) unstable; urgency=low * Set target versio

Re: [RFS] 'solr' uploaded to mentors.debian.net

Hi Jan-Pascal, thanks for your review. I've uploaded an updated version to mentors: http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/s/solr @mjj: Please be so kind to sponsor if you're satisfied. > - In the solr 1.3 package, the tomcat integration package is > solr-tomcat6. In yours, it's solr-tomcat.

Re: Liferay packaging for Debian and Ubuntu

On Sun, Feb 7, 2010 at 9:09 PM, Ludovic Claude wrote: > I can see some problem here: Jackrabbit 1.x uses JSR 170, with is under > a non-free license (Day software grants you a fee-free use of the > sotfware - something like that but you need to check). Ugly, a JSR with no free implementation avai