Re: RFS: libnanoxml2-java (updated package)

2010-02-05 Thread Sveinung Kvilhaugsvik
> You need a default which is a real package and satisfiable on all > architectures, which openjdk is not. If you don't explicitly need openjdk, > then > you should have default-jre as the concrete depends (which is openjdk on most > platforms). > Fixed. >> Not sure what you mean here. Doesn't ja

Re: Eclipse 3.5

2010-02-05 Thread Manuel Prinz
Hi Niels, thanks a lot for your status update! I think that was very informative for a lot of users and --as I read it-- pretty good news for those waiting for the new Eclipse version. Am Mittwoch, den 03.02.2010, 23:34 +0100 schrieb Niels Thykier: > The long answer is that we need to patch 6 dep