On Thu Feb 04 21:36, Sveinung Kvilhaugsvik wrote:
> > - If you are build-depending on default-jdk, why are you then depending on
> > openjdk?
> OpenJDK is just the default unless another dependency in
> java2-runtime-headless is installed. The idea was to ensure repeatable
> builds if another pac
> Hi, I'm looking over the package now.
Sorry about the delay. I had tried jh_innstalljavadocs before but
misunderstood a few things. I tried again since it was in your
feedback. It took some time to figure out what I had done wrong. (And
to debug I needed a long slice of time that I didn't have un
Hello
(disclaimer: I am not the Jabref Debian maintainer)
On Tue, Feb 2, 2010 at 6:02 PM, Egon Willighagen
wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 2, 2010 at 3:49 PM, Marcelo Laia wrote:
>> marc...@laia:~$ sudo aptitude show jabref
>> Pacote: jabref
>> Depends on: openjdk-6-jre, antlr, antlr3, libjgoodies-look
2010/2/4 Vincent Fourmond :
[snip]
> Jabref depends on openjdk-6-jre because I don't think it works with
> other free Java implementations.
>From the developers site
>(http://jabref.sourceforge.net/documentation.php#linux)
[quote]
You must have Java 1.5 or newer installed. Most current Linux
On Thu, Feb 4, 2010 at 12:44 PM, Marcelo Laia wrote:
> Like that there is no need to make that decision for the user, based
> on Debian police (see yours previous comments), this way to upgrade
> jabref is not the Debian way, so, I will not upgrade that package
> manually and I believe that this i
2010/2/2 Egon Willighagen :
> Dear Marcelo,
[snip]
> traditionally, dependencies were defined like (see Debian Java Policy):
>
> java2-runtime | openjdk-6-jre
[snip]
>On Tue, Feb 2, 2010 at 5:05 PM, Marcelo Laia wrote:
>> I will not upgrade the jabref package!
>No one is. You can always just d
6 matches
Mail list logo
