On 2009-12-12, Alan Greenberger wrote:
> Next I downloaded a trivial java test program from
> http://freemind.sourceforge.net/wiki/index.php/FreeMind_on_Linux
> javac DummyPrinter.java
> strace java DummyPrinter
> It hangs with:
> futex(0xb7d6cbd8, FUTEX_WAIT, 1992, NULL
> After three minutes
Note: This version adds certain compiler flag in rules file to fix
FTBFS on hppa. The sponsorer should check that it actually works.
The latest changelog entry for reference:
java-gnome (4.0.14-1) unstable; urgency=low
* New upstream release.
* debian/rules
- Add compiler flag -ffunction-
On Wed Dec 16 04:28, Pablo Duboue wrote:
> apt-get source is neither convenient nor reasonable, particularly with
> jars that are the result of complex builds involving ant, maven, etc.
> If there are -dbg for other libraries why they can't be -dbg for java
> ones? Besides the source code, having t
On Wed, Dec 16, 2009 at 10:28 AM, Pablo Duboue wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 16, 2009 at 4:16 AM, Matthew Johnson wrote:
>> On Wed Dec 16 03:58, Pablo Duboue wrote:
>>> What about having -dbg versions of the jars that include the source code and
>>> debug information?
>>
>> Java policy says (or will say)
Le mercredi 16 décembre 2009 à 04:13 -0500, Pablo Duboue a écrit :
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA256
>
>
>
> >> What about having -dbg versions of the jars that include the source code
> >> and
> >> debug information?
> > What is "debug information" in the Java world ?
>
> Ac
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On Wed, Dec 16, 2009 at 4:16 AM, Matthew Johnson wrote:
> On Wed Dec 16 03:58, Pablo Duboue wrote:
>> What about having -dbg versions of the jars that include the source code and
>> debug information?
>
> Java policy says (or will say) that we sh
Le mercredi 16 décembre 2009 à 03:58 -0500, Pablo Duboue a écrit :
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA256
>
>
> On Wed, Dec 16, 2009 at 3:51 AM, Marcus Better wrote:
> > Onkar Shinde wrote:
> >>> Would it be useful to have PACKAGE-dev packages for java containing the
> >>> source co
On Tue Dec 15 21:05, Onkar Shinde wrote:
> Please file a bug. The docs should go to /usr/share/doc/junit4/api.
>
> > Maybe we should add a section to java-policy about the right position?
I thought it was there, either currently or in the new draft. It
certainly should be. The new version of java
On Wed Dec 16 03:58, Pablo Duboue wrote:
> What about having -dbg versions of the jars that include the source code and
> debug information?
Java policy says (or will say) that we should leave debugging symbols
in the release version (don't compile with -g) anyway. As was said
upthread, there's a
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
>> What about having -dbg versions of the jars that include the source code and
>> debug information?
> What is "debug information" in the Java world ?
Actually, the .class files with debug info are so verbose that can be decompiled
close to the o
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On Wed, Dec 16, 2009 at 3:51 AM, Marcus Better wrote:
> Onkar Shinde wrote:
>>> Would it be useful to have PACKAGE-dev packages for java containing the
>>> source code, so that I can refer to it when developing on top of a
>>> library?
>>
>> Ideall
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Onkar Shinde wrote:
>> Would it be useful to have PACKAGE-dev packages for java containing the
>> source code, so that I can refer to it when developing on top of a
>> library?
>
> Ideally you shouldn't refer to source code of libraries for writing
>
12 matches
Mail list logo
