The swt-gtk and eclipse debate (was Re: RFS: swt-gtk 3.5.1 (updated package))

2009-12-08 Thread Niels Thykier
Damien Raude-Morvan wrote: > Le mardi 08 décembre 2009 20:09:57, Onkar Shinde a écrit : >> On Tue, Dec 8, 2009 at 11:44 PM, Adrian Perez > wrote: >>> Hello Mathias. >>> >>> Although is still an open discussion, we're making our best efforts to >>> not build SWT from eclipse at all, and just make

Re: RFS: swt-gtk 3.5.1 (updated package)

2009-12-08 Thread Benjamin Drung
Am Dienstag, den 08.12.2009, 23:44 +0100 schrieb Matthias Klose: > On 08.12.2009 19:14, Adrian Perez wrote: > > Hello Mathias. > > > > Although is still an open discussion, we're making our best efforts to > > not build SWT from eclipse at all, and just make it depend on the > > swt-gtk generated p

Re: RFS: swt-gtk 3.5.1 (updated package)

2009-12-08 Thread Matthias Klose
On 08.12.2009 19:14, Adrian Perez wrote: Hello Mathias. Although is still an open discussion, we're making our best efforts to not build SWT from eclipse at all, and just make it depend on the swt-gtk generated packages. no, that's the wrong thing to do. The packages should not be built twice.

Re: Something fishy with java? sbuild/apt-get? edos?

2009-12-08 Thread Matthias Klose
On 08.12.2009 23:19, Cyril Brulebois wrote: Niels Thykier (08/12/2009): For the babel case aptitude revealed the following problem: default-jdk-builddep depends on gcj-jdk, which conflicts with gjdoc. This is also the case for brltty; except the gjdoc is only an indirect B-D. Niels kindly re

Re: Something fishy with java? sbuild/apt-get? edos?

2009-12-08 Thread Cyril Brulebois
Niels Thykier (08/12/2009): > For the babel case aptitude revealed the following problem: > default-jdk-builddep depends on gcj-jdk, which conflicts with gjdoc. > > This is also the case for brltty; except the gjdoc is only an > indirect B-D. Niels kindly reported the bug against java-gcj-compat

Re: Bug#559967: FTBFS [hppa]: method openConnection() in the type URL is not...

2009-12-08 Thread Damien Raude-Morvan
Hi, Le mardi 08 décembre 2009 01:59:27, dann frazier a écrit : > libxmlrpc3-java reliably fails to build on hppa: > > https://buildd.debian.org/build.php?&pkg=libxmlrpc3-java&ver=3.1.2-1&arch= > hppa&file=log > > From the most recent build attempt: [...] > [javac] 30. ERROR in > /build/bu

Re: Something fishy with java? sbuild/apt-get? edos?

2009-12-08 Thread Niels Thykier
Cyril Brulebois wrote: > Hi, > > I've noticed some packages FTBFSing due to java stuff being > uninstallable[1,2]. Since quite some time already, edos checks are > performed to make sure Build-Depends are installable before trying a > build, so I'm wondering whether edos is missing something here,

Re: RFS: swt-gtk 3.5.1 (updated package)

2009-12-08 Thread Damien Raude-Morvan
Le mardi 08 décembre 2009 20:09:57, Onkar Shinde a écrit : > On Tue, Dec 8, 2009 at 11:44 PM, Adrian Perez wrote: > > Hello Mathias. > > > > Although is still an open discussion, we're making our best efforts to > > not build SWT from eclipse at all, and just make it depend on the > > swt-gtk gen

Re: RFS: swt-gtk 3.5.1 (updated package)

2009-12-08 Thread Onkar Shinde
On Tue, Dec 8, 2009 at 11:44 PM, Adrian Perez wrote: > Hello Mathias. > > Although is still an open discussion, we're making our best efforts to > not build SWT from eclipse at all, and just make it depend on the > swt-gtk generated packages. I am in agreement with Adrian here. There are at least

Something fishy with java? sbuild/apt-get? edos?

2009-12-08 Thread Cyril Brulebois
Hi, I've noticed some packages FTBFSing due to java stuff being uninstallable[1,2]. Since quite some time already, edos checks are performed to make sure Build-Depends are installable before trying a build, so I'm wondering whether edos is missing something here, whether sbuild/apt-get are failing

Re: RFS: swt-gtk 3.5.1 (updated package)

2009-12-08 Thread Adrian Perez
Hello Mathias. Although is still an open discussion, we're making our best efforts to not build SWT from eclipse at all, and just make it depend on the swt-gtk generated packages. On Tue, 2009-12-08 at 15:29 +0100, Matthias Klose wrote: > On 08.12.2009 15:15, Adrian Perez wrote: > > Please proces

Re: RFS: swt-gtk 3.5.1 (updated package)

2009-12-08 Thread Damien Raude-Morvan
On Tue, 08 Dec 2009 15:29:56 +0100, Matthias Klose wrote: > On 08.12.2009 15:15, Adrian Perez wrote: >> Please process this upload. >> Sorry about not including the link in the previous message, something I >> assumed ;) >> http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/s/swt-gtk/swt-gtk_3.5.1-1.dsc >

Re: RFS: swt-gtk 3.5.1 (updated package)

2009-12-08 Thread Matthias Klose
On 08.12.2009 15:15, Adrian Perez wrote: Please process this upload. Sorry about not including the link in the previous message, something I assumed ;) http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/s/swt-gtk/swt-gtk_3.5.1-1.dsc what is the status of building these packages from the eclipse source

RFS: swt-gtk 3.5.1 (updated package)

2009-12-08 Thread Adrian Perez
Please process this upload. Sorry about not including the link in the previous message, something I assumed ;) http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/s/swt-gtk/swt-gtk_3.5.1-1.dsc Best Regards. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-java-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe"

pkg-java on Alioth + looking for administrator for list pkg-java-maintainers

2009-12-08 Thread Arnaud Vandyck
Hi all, I've removed myself from Alioth's pkg-kaffe and pkg-java projects. I am still administrator of the pkg-java-maintainers list on Alioth. Can someone from the project contact me to have the password to manage the list (it mainly consist of removing spam from time to time). Cheers, -- Arn

Re: RFS: tijmp 0.8+dfsg-2

2009-12-08 Thread Mehdi Dogguy
Onkar Shinde wrote: > Latest changelog entry for references. This merges changes from Ubuntu. > Done. Please tag it in the svn repo. -- Mehdi Dogguy مهدي الدڤي http://dogguy.org/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-java-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contac