On Sat, Nov 14, 2009 at 3:52 PM, Vincent Fourmond wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> Eric Lavarde wrote:
>> I'm using heavily svn-buildpackage, so I won't switch until it's
>> supported. Furthermore, it makes multi-platform packaging (Debian, older
>> Debian, Ubuntu, etc...) more difficult.
>>
>> And honestly
Hi list,
I made a package that uses ~/.eclipse/eclipserc file for users' configuration.
But as the comment in Bug#402077(*), it seems not to be recommended.
It works with eclipse3.4 in Debian but not with 3.5 in Ubuntu 9.10.
So, what should I use for unless eclipserc? Could someone tell me, p
Vincent Fourmond ha scritto:
> There is no need for a solution: for dual-licensed stuff, or for "or
> later" stuff, you just need that one combination of the licenses makes a
> whole which is legally distributable/usable. You don't need to change
> any license here. The combination of both packag
Hello,
Giovanni Mascellani wrote:
> Working on packaging openide-util (in order to use it in freehep) I
> realized that it is distributed under a dual license CDDL and GPL-2
> (_without_ the "or any later version" clause). Freehep is distributed
> under LGPL-2.1 or later.
>
> TTBOMK, these lic
Hi all.
Working on packaging openide-util (in order to use it in freehep) I
realized that it is distributed under a dual license CDDL and GPL-2
(_without_ the "or any later version" clause). Freehep is distributed
under LGPL-2.1 or later.
TTBOMK, these licenses are incompatible: the only way to s
Hello,
Eric Lavarde wrote:
> I'm using heavily svn-buildpackage, so I won't switch until it's
> supported. Furthermore, it makes multi-platform packaging (Debian, older
> Debian, Ubuntu, etc...) more difficult.
>
> And honestly, I don't understand why we should switch "as a team". It's
> a pac
Hi,
I'm using heavily svn-buildpackage, so I won't switch until it's
supported. Furthermore, it makes multi-platform packaging (Debian, older
Debian, Ubuntu, etc...) more difficult.
And honestly, I don't understand why we should switch "as a team". It's
a packager's and sponsor's decision, n
7 matches
Mail list logo