On Wed, Sep 16, 2009 at 12:10 PM, Kalle Kivimaa wrote:
> Niels Thykier writes:
>> I went through the list of our public packages listed here[1] and it
>> turns out that we have 7 packages depending on a non-free version of
>> java (as an alternative to a free or a java-runtimeN).
>
> Eh? I checke
On Tue, Sep 15, 2009 at 11:09 PM, Torsten Werner wrote:
> 2. You cannot binNMU an Architecture: all package but java packages
> are usually of Architecture: all.
That may change at some point, there have been rumblings about
throwing away maintainer-built packages (but still requiring them) and
Am Sonntag, den 13.09.2009, 22:35 +0200 schrieb Michael Koch:
> I'm in contact with Manuel (the only uploader) and he is working on a
> new version.
The new version will be uploaded RSN. I hope suring the week, but might
take until the weekend. I guess we can afford to wait this; I don't mind
NMUi
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Torsten Werner
* Package name: libjboss-nxio-java
Version : 1.2.1.GA
Upstream Author : JBoss Community
* URL : http://jboss.org/xnio/
* License : LGPL
Programming Lang: Java
Description : simplified low-level I/O
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Torsten Werner
* Package name: libjboss-marshalling-java
Version : 1.1.3.GA
Upstream Author : JBoss Community
* URL : http://jboss.org/jbossmarshalling/
* License : LGPL
Programming Lang: Java
Description : altern
Hi Matt,
On Wed, Sep 2, 2009 at 10:45 AM, Matthew Johnson wrote:
> possibly aided by binnmus
AFAIK binNMUs won't work for most java packages.
1. They work for languages where API (source level compatibilty) and
ABI (binary compatibility) are not the same. You will binMNU a package
whenever the
6 matches
Mail list logo
