Hi Jonny,
Can you please upload the next revision of java3d? It should fix FTBFS
on all architectures. I have committed changes to pkg-java svn.
Following is the changelog entry.
java3d (1.5.2+dfsg-2) unstable; urgency=low
* debian/control
- Add myself to uploaders.
- Move default-jdk
On Thu, Aug 13, 2009 at 10:30 AM, Torsten
Werner wrote:
> Hi Onkar,
>
> On Thu, Aug 13, 2009 at 6:04 AM, Onkar Shinde wrote:
>> The java3d package has failed to build on all non-i386 platforms. I am
>> looking into build failures. It should be fixed in a day or two.
>
> default-jdk should be moved
>On Wed Aug 12 02:10, Onkar Shinde wrote:
>> I am looking for sponsor for my package excalibur-logkit. The package
>> is a build-dep for Jmeter. I have merged the package from Ubuntu and
>> made necessary changes to fit it in Debian.
>> The packaging bits are present in pkg-java svn. I request that
Hi Onkar,
On Thu, Aug 13, 2009 at 6:04 AM, Onkar Shinde wrote:
> The java3d package has failed to build on all non-i386 platforms. I am
> looking into build failures. It should be fixed in a day or two.
default-jdk should be moved to Build-Depends.
Cheers,
Torsten
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
On Thu, Aug 13, 2009 at 7:51 AM, Duarte Silva wrote:
> Hi,
> first let me congratulate you for your efforts to maintain java.
> I would like to request something of you, could you add libjava3d-jni
> (AMD64) to sid?
>
> Thanks for your time.
Duarte,
The java3d package has failed to build on all n
On Wed Aug 12 02:10, Onkar Shinde wrote:
> I am looking for sponsor for my package excalibur-logkit. The package
> is a build-dep for Jmeter. I have merged the package from Ubuntu and
> made necessary changes to fit it in Debian.
> The packaging bits are present in pkg-java svn. I request that the
On Wed Aug 12 11:44, Adrian Perez wrote:
> Sure it did. Uploaded to mentors, and commited at:
> svn://svn.debian.org/svn/pkg-java/trunk/azureus.
Uploaded
Matt
--
Matthew Johnson
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On Tue Aug 11 10:18, Picca Frédéric-Emmanuel wrote:
> It is up to you to upload it.
> dget
> http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/r/remotetea/remotetea_1.0.7-1.dsc
uploaded
> PS: I chenged my gpg signature to use a better one.
> My name was not compleate in the old one
>
> picca frederic
On Wed, Aug 12, 2009 at 11:53 AM, Jan-Pascal van
Best wrote:
> Torsten Werner wrote:
>> On Tue, Aug 11, 2009 at 12:53 PM, Vincent Fourmond
>> wrote:
>>> I'm wondering: would it be a good idea to remove everything but to
>>> leave a dummy file in pkg-java/trunk/solr stating that the packaging
>>>
On Wed, Aug 12, 2009 at 11:53 AM, Jan-Pascal van
Best wrote:
> It seems like 'old' contains 'old packages', that aren't maintained
> anymore. Moving solr there would suggest that Debian packaging of solr
> has halted. I would prefer Vincent's suggestion. What do others think?
sounds reasonable
C
On Wed, 2009-08-12 at 15:08 +0530, Onkar Shinde wrote:
> I have few comments about the package.
There are welcome, that was what I was asking for. ;)
> 1. In the launcher script, use of Sun java is being forced. That's a
> bad thing. Try to use java-wrappers to detect JRE, specify classpath
> an
Torsten Werner wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Tue, Aug 11, 2009 at 12:53 PM, Vincent Fourmond wrote:
>
>> I'm wondering: would it be a good idea to remove everything but to
>> leave a dummy file in pkg-java/trunk/solr stating that the packaging
>> has been moved to a git repository ?
>>
> I recommend
On Wed Aug 12 15:08, Onkar Shinde wrote:
> > I've fixed all warnings, and now the package is entirely lintian clean
> > (even with --pedantic). IMHO it's ready for uploading.
(I should be able to look at this tonight)
> I have few comments about the package.
> 1. In the launcher script, use of S
On Tue, Aug 11, 2009 at 11:57 PM, Adrian Perez wrote:
> Sorry about the pixmap size, gimp really played at me on this ;)
>
> I've fixed all warnings, and now the package is entirely lintian clean
> (even with --pedantic). IMHO it's ready for uploading.
I have few comments about the package.
1. In
14 matches
Mail list logo
