Re: FTBFS of libjogl-java on armel

Le mardi 28 juillet 2009 à 20:29 +0530, Onkar Shinde a écrit : > Hi all, > > According to following changelog entry, the build of javadoc was > disabled on armel to fix BTFS of libjogl-java. > > libjogl-java (1.1.1+dak1-5) unstable; urgency=low > . >* Standards-Version updated to version 3.8

Re: javadoc problem with default-jdk

Hi Matthew, On Thu, Aug 6, 2009 at 9:56 AM, Matthew Johnson wrote: > Does it support building packages with debhelper rather than cdbs? Please see . Cheers, Torsten -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-java-requ...@lists.debian.

Re: Any plan to update java3d

On Thu, Aug 06, 15:38:15 +0530, Onkar Shinde wrote: > No. 'cvs export' is like creating a copy of cvs repository without any > revision information. So it does not contain any CVS directories. > In case of svn, 'svn export' skips .svn directories. :-) Ah, sorry, I read the names the wrong way arou

Re: Any plan to update java3d

On Thu, Aug 06, 14:31:50 +0530, Onkar Shinde wrote: > 2. I am using cvs export instead of cvs chekout in get-orig-source > target. Not a major change, it just doesn't require any user > interaction. Aren't the annoying CVS directories going to appear in upstream tarballs now then? -- Jonny Lamb,

Re: Any plan to update java3d

On Thu, Aug 6, 2009 at 3:15 PM, Jonny Lamb wrote: > On Thu, Aug 06, 14:31:50 +0530, Onkar Shinde wrote: >> 2. I am using cvs export instead of cvs chekout in get-orig-source >> target. Not a major change, it just doesn't require any user >> interaction. > > Aren't the annoying CVS directories going

Re: javadoc problem with default-jdk

Le Wed, 05 Aug 2009 23:41:54 +0100, Ludovic Claude a écrit : > > Matthias, I have just uploaded a new version of maven-debian-helper. > It uses Maven to build packages, and supports now the generation of > Javadoc packages. There is also a utility, mh_make, which given a > Maven project will try

Re: Any plan to update java3d

On Wed, Aug 5, 2009 at 10:45 PM, Jonny Lamb wrote: > On Wed, Aug 05, 22:31:08 +0530, Onkar Shinde wrote: >> 1. Remove dfsg from version. > > As long as the upstream tarball which is uploaded does not contain any > non-DFSG files, sure. Perhaps it's just the CVS snapshot with these > weird files whi

Re: javadoc problem with default-jdk

Le Wed, 05 Aug 2009 18:05:11 +0200, Matthias Klose a écrit : > No, this looks wrong, because you cannot enforce this for packages > where the docs are shipped in the same package. You should > use /usr/share/doc/ package>/api, and maybe add a directory /usr/share/doc/ > package>with an api > sym

Re: javadoc problem with default-jdk

On Wed Aug 05 23:41, Ludovic Claude wrote: > Matthias, I have just uploaded a new version of maven-debian-helper. It > uses Maven to build packages Does it support building packages with debhelper rather than cdbs? > packages. There is also a utility, mh_make, which given a Maven project > will t