Re: Any plan to update java3d

On Tue, Jun 30, 2009 at 7:37 PM, Onkar Shinde wrote: > Hi Jonny, > > Any update on this? I wish to explore the possibility of using java3d > as build/runtime dependency for electric [1] [2] when uploading latest > upstream version. I would like to use latest stable package of java3d > for this. > >

Re: Reviews from the DebConf BoF

On Thu, Jul 30, 2009 at 10:40 PM, Matthew Johnson wrote: > On Thu Jul 30 19:05, Torsten Werner wrote: >> we do no longer want to use /usr/share/cdbs/1/rules/simple-patchsys.mk >> for patching source code. > > Ah, yes, I forgot about that. I think quilt was suggested as the best > option, particular

packaging of remotetea an RPC implementation

Hello I am working at the french synchotron radiation facility and we are using the Tango constrol system http://tango-controls.org for all our experiments. Most of the graphical part of the control system was written using java (swig) and based on CORBA. The ancestor of this control system was T

Re: Reviews from the DebConf BoF

On Thu Jul 30 19:05, Torsten Werner wrote: > we do no longer want to use /usr/share/cdbs/1/rules/simple-patchsys.mk > for patching source code. Ah, yes, I forgot about that. I think quilt was suggested as the best option, particularly since this will aid transition to the new source format. Matt

Re: Reviews from the DebConf BoF

Hi Matthew, On Thu, Jul 30, 2009 at 6:19 PM, Matthew Johnson wrote: > Comments please, we do no longer want to use /usr/share/cdbs/1/rules/simple-patchsys.mk for patching source code. Cheers, Torsten -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-java-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscri

Reviews from the DebConf BoF

Hi all, We had two BoF meetings at DebConf to discuss Java packaging. Here's a summary of what we discussed. I've also attached a diff to the Java policy that we agreed on. There are other changes which need some more discussion first. Non-controversial changes - First o

Re: updating java-common for openjdk

On Thu, Jul 30, 2009 at 7:13 PM, Torsten Werner wrote: > I have uploaded java-common 0.33 to unstable. > > On Thu, Jul 30, 2009 at 12:49 PM, Onkar Shinde wrote: >> This is a welcome move from Ubuntu developers point of view. Now that >> the tool chain for java will be same in both distributions mor

java-common_0.33_amd64.changes ACCEPTED

Accepted: default-jdk-builddep_1.6-33_amd64.deb to pool/main/j/java-common/default-jdk-builddep_1.6-33_amd64.deb default-jdk_1.6-33_amd64.deb to pool/main/j/java-common/default-jdk_1.6-33_amd64.deb default-jre-headless_1.6-33_amd64.deb to pool/main/j/java-common/default-jre-headless_1.6-33_a

java-common override disparity

There are disparities between your recently accepted upload and the override file for the following file(s): default-jre-headless_1.6-33_amd64.deb: package says section is java, override says interpreters. default-jre_1.6-33_amd64.deb: package says section is java, override says interpreters.

Re: updating java-common for openjdk

I have uploaded java-common 0.33 to unstable. On Thu, Jul 30, 2009 at 12:49 PM, Onkar Shinde wrote: > This is a welcome move from Ubuntu developers point of view. Now that > the tool chain for java will be same in both distributions more > patches can flow in either direction. Strictly speaking D

Processing of java-common_0.33_amd64.changes

java-common_0.33_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: java-common_0.33.dsc java-common_0.33.tar.gz java-common_0.33_all.deb default-jre_1.6-33_amd64.deb default-jre-headless_1.6-33_amd64.deb default-jdk_1.6-33_amd64.deb default-jdk-builddep_1.6-33_amd

Re: How to use jh_depends in cdbs based rules file

On Fri, Jul 24, 2009 at 2:06 PM, Matthew Johnson wrote: > On Fri Jul 24 03:00, Onkar Shinde wrote: >> Can you please explain to me how does jh_depends calculate the >> dependencies? As per my understanding it relies on Class-Path >> attribute from MANIFEST.MF of the jar it is processing. If that is

Re: updating java-common for openjdk

On Wed, Jul 29, 2009 at 11:47 PM, Torsten Werner wrote: > Hi, > > > I have rebuilt 116 source packages from the trunk dir in SVN with > Ubuntu's version of java-common which uses openjdk as the default-jdk > instead of gcj. 3 packages fail to build now. I have filed bug reports >